Charas-Project

Off-Topic => All of all! => Topic started by: DaAlmightyWombat on June 12, 2005, 07:50:39 PM

Title: Which RPG Maker do you prefer?
Post by: DaAlmightyWombat on June 12, 2005, 07:50:39 PM: I prefer 2000, because of its simpler battle system. You don't have to go running around looking for battle characters and battle weapons, and it seems like all the cool monsters are front view. However I actually use 2003 because 2000 keeps crashing on me...

EDIT: I messed up the poll thing ._.
Title:
Post by: Drace on June 12, 2005, 07:52:10 PM: None.
Title:
Post by: Rune_of_Punishment on June 12, 2005, 07:52:28 PM: RPG Maker 2, PS2..... XD

Actually I like 2003 better, I just want to use battle animations to make my battle chars (can execute more movements) and I suck at editting.
Title:
Post by: X-F3R on June 12, 2005, 08:22:54 PM: well... 2003.. basically, everyone's using Legion Saga 3's style of manipulating the DBS.. 2k3 has more capabilities than 2k (that's why it's 2k3 :D)

also for Custom Battle Systems, 2k3 is a recommendation..

2k3's my vote ^_^
Title:
Post by: FFL2and3rocks on June 12, 2005, 08:28:24 PM: I prefer RM2k because I like the DBS better than RM2k3's.

Plus, I suck at making battlechars. :blue-eye:
Title:
Post by: RuneBlade on June 12, 2005, 09:04:19 PM: Quote
Originally posted by FFL2and3rocks
I prefer RM2k because I like the DBS better than RM2k3's.

Plus, I suck at making battlechars. :blue-eye:

Same here.
Title:
Post by: Snake Eater on June 12, 2005, 09:53:58 PM: 2003
Title:
Post by: BlackIceAdept on June 12, 2005, 10:27:23 PM: 2003 terms are better and more options...

but 2000 in events sorry guys but 2k3 is a P.O.S. when it comes to that.
Title:
Post by: Leon_1990 on June 12, 2005, 10:36:44 PM: 2003....
i have equal training with rm2k3 and rm2k, and I Prefer rm2k...
Even though it is a hard choice seeing as I think they are both amazing
Title:
Post by: Rune_of_Punishment on June 12, 2005, 10:56:07 PM: 2003 = level 99 and 9999 HP!
2000 = level 50 and 999 HP...

2003 is clearly better....
Title:
Post by: WarxePB on June 12, 2005, 11:11:59 PM: RM2K3 is better for doing custom battle and menu systems, mainly because you have way more recognized Key Input functions.

And for all of you who like the RM2K DBS better, you can duplicate it in RM2K3 by taking the battlechars out and changing all the monsters to front-view versions.
Title:
Post by: Rune_of_Punishment on June 12, 2005, 11:16:43 PM: You'd have to position the invisible battle chars where the battle window is, otherwise, you'll see battle animations hitting air.
Title:
Post by: wildguy3922 on June 13, 2005, 12:10:51 AM: 2000, because you stick with 2000 for a while, you get used to what the labels are. But if you go to 2003, the labels changed and they seem they're labeled so that new people can read and understand it.
Title:
Post by: Kijuki_Magazaki on June 13, 2005, 04:34:39 AM: actually, I pretty much like them both; no preference.
Title:
Post by: Rune_of_Punishment on June 13, 2005, 04:39:47 AM: I like RPG Maker 1 for the PSX. It's so hxc..
Title:
Post by: Sephiroth rocks on June 13, 2005, 07:36:16 AM: Rm2k3. It's better simply 'cuz it has more options.
Title:
Post by: barnsalot on June 13, 2005, 11:16:13 AM: 2K3 for the same reason Sephiroth does.
Title:
Post by: Moosetroop11 on June 14, 2005, 11:08:06 AM: *Shudder* I hate the rm2k battle system. I just can't get used to it. Rm2k3 gets my vote.
Title:
Post by: Dashman on June 14, 2005, 12:16:44 PM: Rpgm2k for many reasons.

1.-Don't have to look for battle charas once you get a new charset.

2.-My rpgm2k3 crash my pc almost all time

3.-I just can't get used to have 9999 hp. I prefer smaller numbers.

4.-All the monsters but the slime and the bat on my rpgm2k3 have 10 hp and 10 of almost all.

5.-I don't have to worry about weapons, too.

In a few words, Rpgm2k gets my vote!

:jumpin: Rpgm2k

:frag: rpgm2k3
Title:
Post by: Sephiroth rocks on June 14, 2005, 04:35:15 PM: You could at least have given some better reasons!

1.-Don't have to look for battle charas once you get a new charset.

You're just lazy.

2.-My rpgm2k3 crash my pc almost all time

You've probably downloaded a corrupted version or you might need a newer comp than your Commandore 64.

3.-I just can't get used to have 9999 hp. I prefer smaller numbers.

Actually far the most RPG (Incl. all FF's) use that measurements.

4.-All the monsters but the slime and the bat on my rpgm2k3 have 10 hp and 10 of almost all.

Again you've downloaded a corrupted version.

5.-I don't have to worry about weapons, too.

And again you're just being freeking lazy!

And don't use gun smilies!
Title:
Post by: Drace on June 14, 2005, 04:40:29 PM: Quote
Originally posted by Sephiroth rocks
you might need a newer comp than your Commandore 64.

Commandore 64 XD *dies of laughture*
Title:
Post by: Al~Len on June 14, 2005, 04:44:43 PM: Quote
Originally posted by Sephiroth rocks
3.-I just can't get used to have 9999 hp. I prefer smaller numbers.

Actually far the most RPG (Incl. all FF's) use that measurements.

It's not like you can't set the max hp lower anyway.. >_>
Title:
Post by: Dragonium on June 14, 2005, 04:45:57 PM: Rm2K3, without a doubt. Rm2K is just dumb. It's like Rm2K3's pukey, smelly little brother, which ruins your life by whining endlessly, downloading dumbass things, and wrecking your belongings, your computer, and basically your life.
Title:
Post by: Al~Len on June 14, 2005, 04:48:24 PM: Well, I do prefer RM2k3, but I don't think Rm2k sucks..
Say if someone didn't like the default battle system.. didn't they just script a better one?..

Allen recalls people doing that.. I can't say I use RPGmaker vastly however, so my memory is fuzzy.
Title:
Post by: Leon_1990 on June 14, 2005, 04:49:25 PM: Quote
Originally posted by Sephiroth rocks

3.-I just can't get used to have 9999 hp. I prefer smaller numbers.

Actually far the most RPG (Incl. all FF's) use that measurements.

Hmmm.... I afraid your wrong there Sephrocks....
Final fantasy1 had a Max h.p. of 999 I think...

Just pointing that out ^^
Title:
Post by: GaryCXJk on June 14, 2005, 06:31:21 PM: I prefer Game Maker :P
Title:
Post by: VulcanRaven336 on June 14, 2005, 06:35:20 PM: I like using Rm2k better. I like the front view system and I can't get used to the 2k3 battle view. It's funny how there's a fierce looking monster and youre fighting it and the heroes are all smilling when they fight. . .
But 2k3 is great for ABS and CMS, too bad 2k isn't as good.

2k still get's my vote.
Title:
Post by: Enduo_Ril on June 14, 2005, 06:53:40 PM: RM2k3.

But 2000 does have one thing a lot better... the RTP facesets.
2k3's RTP facesets BLOW.
Title:
Post by: Darkfox on June 14, 2005, 07:10:02 PM: Actually the RTP monsters and faces for RM2k stunk. Too cartoony.
Title:
Post by: benosalankelley on June 15, 2005, 02:14:28 AM: XP.

not a emoticon.

>:
Title:
Post by: ZeroKirbyX on June 15, 2005, 02:31:44 AM: 2003, but if someone manages to make a decent CBS on PS1 RPG maker, I will bow down to them.
Title:
Post by: VahnGrave on June 15, 2005, 05:14:42 AM: I like RM2K3... I like the battle system tons more, because you can make it look freakin awesome without THAT much effort. Plus, making battlechars can be FUN if you sit down and actually do it.
Title:
Post by: Petunia on June 15, 2005, 08:44:28 PM: Rm2k3! Side on battles!

Nough said!
Title:
Post by: maxine on June 23, 2005, 11:32:46 AM: i would say 2003 as every 1 elses reason. Cooler battles.

And i dont like 2000 anymore cuz some harmony.dll file keeps poping up i needed. EVEN if i have it.

Answer is RM2K3