Post by: Cosmos on August 13, 2006, 03:24:31 PM
"Spiderman 3"
In may 2007 Tobey Maguire returns for anotehr go-round as the web-slinger and his alter-ego, Peter parker. For this third adventure, the sandman will be the main villain, a guy who can turn his body into anything from a blinding sandstorm to a concrete-hard pile driver (he's played by Thomas Haden Church (whoever that is)).
Meanwhile, Spidey discovers an ultracool black costume that's actually alien entity called Venom, and Topher Grace will play Eddie Rock, a shady chracter who becomes attached to the suit. Plus, James Fraco's Harry Osborn will don the Green Goblin suit worn by his late pop.
So, yay!
"The Dark Knight"
Director Christopher Nolan's second Batman flick (After last year's "Batman Begins" (which I thought was ok)) isn;t due until June 2008, but fans are buzzing over the recent annoucement that Heath Ledger has signed on to play the Clown Prince of Crim, The Joker (YEAH BABY) - Batman's number one adversary.
Whether or not Ledger can make audiences forget Jack Nicholson's memorable joker in Tim Burton's 1989 flim reminds to be seen.
"Ghost Rider"
At 42, isn't Nicolas Cage a little bit, um, old to be playing "young motorcycle sunt performer" Johnny Blaze, the marvel hero who made a deal with Satan and became a hellspawn? Well, Cage is a huge comics fan. The nephew of director Francis Ford Copola took his stage surname from Marvel hero Luke Cage, and almost became Tim Burton's Man of steel in the mid-90's, when a new superman film was first being readied (Cage recently named his newborn son Kal-El (what a loser), Superman's Krypton name).
In the movie, Blaze faces Blackheart (Wes Bently) and his father Mephisto (Peter Fonda), the villians responsible for his curse. "Ghost Rider" will pop a wheelie in theaters this February.
And, the dude who created Buffy the vampire slayer.. he's writing a flim for a Wonder Woman movie.. (why..just why?) Keeping ya'll informed, :p
Edit: I've never heard of Ghost Rider.
Post by: Robotam Plus on August 13, 2006, 03:41:18 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Midnight
"Spiderman 3"
In may 2007 Tobey Maguire returns for anotehr go-round as the web-slinger and his alter-ego, Peter parker. For this third adventure, the sandman will be the main villain, a guy who can turn his body into anything from a blinding sandstorm to a concrete-hard pile driver (he's played by Thomas Haden Church (whoever that is)).
Meanwhile, Spidey discovers an ultracool black costume that's actually alien entity called Venom, and Topher Grace will play Eddie Rock, a shady chracter who becomes attached to the suit. Plus, James Fraco's Harry Osborn will don the Green Goblin suit worn by his late pop.
1. Venom is as much villian as the Sandman, they are both main villians.
2. The Alien suit is not called Venom, Venom is the suit bonded with Eddie Brock.
3. It's Eddie Brock. :p
4. Harry won't wear the same suit as his dad. He's wearing some black newbie costume while flying around on a flying snowboard.
Corrections from a spidey nerd, that movie is going to be awesome.
Post by: Cosmos on August 13, 2006, 03:45:10 PM
Post by: Robotam Plus on August 13, 2006, 03:49:16 PM
Post by: Cosmos on August 13, 2006, 03:51:35 PM
Post by: Archem on August 13, 2006, 04:06:56 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Midnight
Edit: I've never heard of Ghost Rider.
Lol, that makes two of us! :D
Post by: I Have a Sandwich on August 13, 2006, 04:32:38 PM
Don't yu say nuttin bad about da Cage. Da Cage owns.
Post by: Linkizcool on August 13, 2006, 04:37:17 PM
Post by: Cosmos on August 13, 2006, 04:46:30 PM
Post by: I Have a Sandwich on August 13, 2006, 04:51:42 PM
Post by: Kijuki_Magazaki on August 13, 2006, 04:54:18 PM
As for the spiderman movie, the main focus will be venom.
Sandman is going to be like the intro villian.you know he'll have problems with him, but then he'll catch the venom suit and kick his butt and then has to fight himself against and the true venom. blah blah.
Post by: X_marks_the_ed on August 13, 2006, 05:44:24 PM
The first was fine, but not really sequel-worthy. I can't believe they're making athird one! Who even watches those Spiderman movies? Studies show that the theatre in my town never got a single ticket sold for Spiderman 2.
I completely agree with the first sentence in the "Ghost Rider" paragraph. It's so pathetic! :bee_wtf:
Post by: Kijuki_Magazaki on August 13, 2006, 05:53:51 PM
Alot of teens wanted venom in it. Venom is in it. This one MIGHT beat the first one.
And they say it was going to be a trilogy from the beggining.
Post by: drenrin2120 on August 13, 2006, 05:54:59 PM
The Unbreakable
Batman Begins
X-Men (though I haven't seen 3)
I'd say Spiderman, but it took him way too friggin' long to tell Mary Jane Slut-face w/e he loved her. That got annoying.
So, that's about it. Don't get mad at me 'cuz I left something out.
Post by: WarxePB on August 13, 2006, 07:13:05 PM
Post by: I Have a Sandwich on August 13, 2006, 07:16:15 PM
As for Cage though, he kicks ***. DOn't say nuttin bad.
Post by: Razor on August 13, 2006, 08:25:46 PM
Quote
Originally posted by X_marks_the_ed
Oh great... more Spiderman. [/Sarcasm]
The first was fine, but not really sequel-worthy. I can't believe they're making athird one! Who even watches those Spiderman movies? Studies show that the theatre in my town never got a single ticket sold for Spiderman 2.
Are you nuts, man?
Spiderman 2 was one of the few movies where the sequal was actually as good and perhaps better than the original! Which isn't easy because the original did rock.
And there's only one upcoming movie I care about.
Post by: Cosmos on August 13, 2006, 08:40:44 PM
Post by: SaiKar on August 13, 2006, 10:52:44 PM
Batman Begins is cool. Jack Nickolson was AWESOME in the first one. The entire rest of the original batman was cheesy except for th Joker's pretty much constant laughs. Hee hee... if they can pull that off again it'll be a good movie.
Post by: EXO Muffin on August 14, 2006, 05:16:01 AM
Post by: Razor on August 14, 2006, 05:29:17 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Midnight
And that is Razor? :P
Snakes.
On a plane.
Post by: Drace on August 14, 2006, 06:48:57 AM
About Ed's bad taste in movies and seeing that his whole town is full with Spidey-hating emos (Population of that town: 1.):
^ 'nuff said.
Post by: Robotam Plus on August 14, 2006, 12:28:11 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SaiKar
Spiderman 2 was awful. Too much angst got in the way. The first was well paced between character development and action. The second had the character development totally dominate the movie except for one very good action scene (the train one, the rest were crap) that couldn't salvage the 2+ hours of total mind-blowing "omg mary jane omg life wah no job wft losing my powers" BS that somehow got people to not leave the theatre. Yeech.
WTH? When I showed you the fake trailer I think you said the second movie was better than the first. :|
I liked Spidey 2 and I don't really care what the rest of the humanity think, as long as something pleases me it's good.
Spidey 3 will be much darker, and I'm guessing that's a good thing (at least for me :)).
Post by: Kijuki_Magazaki on August 14, 2006, 12:59:45 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Razor
quote: Originally posted by Midnight
And that is Razor? :P
Snakes.
On a plane.
No.. way.
Post by: Cosmos on August 14, 2006, 01:39:55 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Razor
quote: Originally posted by Midnight
And that is Razor? :P
Snakes.
On a plane.
You too? I CAN'T WAIT!! I wish to see! :jest:
Post by: Kijuki_Magazaki on August 14, 2006, 01:41:47 PM
Post by: drenrin2120 on August 14, 2006, 01:50:47 PM
Post by: Ace of Spades on August 14, 2006, 02:07:08 PM
And I think that WTC movie is coming out soon, too. N. Cage plays a fireman or something.
Post by: Drace on August 14, 2006, 02:24:51 PM
Post by: Cosmos on August 14, 2006, 02:33:39 PM
Quote
Originally posted by drenrin2120
Except when all the New Yorkers said they wouldn't spread his identity. YEAH RIGHT.
Agree'd. That part annoyed me, because we always snitch >;3 But yeah kijuki, it's serious. The movie looks pretty gewd, :p
Post by: Kijuki_Magazaki on August 14, 2006, 02:40:57 PM
The plot is even cheesy. THE TITLE IS CHEESY.
"Snakes on a plane" =
Post by: Revolution911 on August 14, 2006, 03:09:11 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
blah to batman and ghost rider. a big blah to wonder woman.
As for the spiderman movie, the main focus will be venom.
Sandman is going to be like the intro villian.you know he'll have problems with him, but then he'll catch the venom suit and kick his butt and then has to fight himself against and the true venom. blah blah.
Omg if I hear one more person call it the "Venom" suit I'm going to shoot SOMETHING.
Its symbiote. SYMBIOTE SUIT. SYMBIOTE + EDDIE = VENOM. JUST LIKE HOW SYMBIOTE + KASADY = CARNAGE.
Post by: Robotam Plus on August 14, 2006, 03:15:32 PM
Post by: Kijuki_Magazaki on August 14, 2006, 03:17:58 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Revolution911
quote: Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
blah to batman and ghost rider. a big blah to wonder woman.
As for the spiderman movie, the main focus will be venom.
Sandman is going to be like the intro villian.you know he'll have problems with him, but then he'll catch the venom suit and kick his butt and then has to fight himself against and the true venom. blah blah.
Omg if I hear one more person call it the "Venom" suit I'm going to shoot SOMETHING.
Its symbiote. SYMBIOTE SUIT. SYMBIOTE + EDDIE = VENOM. JUST LIKE HOW SYMBIOTE + KASADY = CARNAGE.
Dude its just a phrase of metaphor. Get over it. Its looks like it would be a "venom" suit. I know who VENOM is. I am not a spiderman dummy, but neither I am a spiderman fanboy.
Post by: coreystranick on August 14, 2006, 03:19:56 PM
I want to see how they would do Carnage's manipulation thing (like changing his hand in to axes and such like it did in the show).
Post by: Revolution911 on August 14, 2006, 03:21:43 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
quote: Originally posted by Revolution911
quote: Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
blah to batman and ghost rider. a big blah to wonder woman.
As for the spiderman movie, the main focus will be venom.
Sandman is going to be like the intro villian.you know he'll have problems with him, but then he'll catch the venom suit and kick his butt and then has to fight himself against and the true venom. blah blah.
Omg if I hear one more person call it the "Venom" suit I'm going to shoot SOMETHING.
Its symbiote. SYMBIOTE SUIT. SYMBIOTE + EDDIE = VENOM. JUST LIKE HOW SYMBIOTE + KASADY = CARNAGE.
Dude its just a phrase of metaphor. Get over it. Its looks like it would be a "venom" suit. I know who VENOM is. I am not a spiderman dummy, but neither I am a spiderman fanboy.
Try to not take me so seriously, bloodytears.
Post by: Kijuki_Magazaki on August 14, 2006, 03:22:57 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Revolution911
quote: Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
quote: Originally posted by Revolution911
quote: Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
blah to batman and ghost rider. a big blah to wonder woman.
As for the spiderman movie, the main focus will be venom.
Sandman is going to be like the intro villian.you know he'll have problems with him, but then he'll catch the venom suit and kick his butt and then has to fight himself against and the true venom. blah blah.
Omg if I hear one more person call it the "Venom" suit I'm going to shoot SOMETHING.
Its symbiote. SYMBIOTE SUIT. SYMBIOTE + EDDIE = VENOM. JUST LIKE HOW SYMBIOTE + KASADY = CARNAGE.
Dude its just a phrase of metaphor. Get over it. Its looks like it would be a "venom" suit. I know who VENOM is. I am not a spiderman dummy, but neither I am a spiderman fanboy.
Try to not take me so seriously, bloodytears.
try not to sound so pathetic.
Post by: Revolution911 on August 14, 2006, 03:24:35 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
quote: Originally posted by Revolution911
quote: Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
quote: Originally posted by Revolution911
quote: Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
blah to batman and ghost rider. a big blah to wonder woman.
As for the spiderman movie, the main focus will be venom.
Sandman is going to be like the intro villian.you know he'll have problems with him, but then he'll catch the venom suit and kick his butt and then has to fight himself against and the true venom. blah blah.
Omg if I hear one more person call it the "Venom" suit I'm going to shoot SOMETHING.
Its symbiote. SYMBIOTE SUIT. SYMBIOTE + EDDIE = VENOM. JUST LIKE HOW SYMBIOTE + KASADY = CARNAGE.
Dude its just a phrase of metaphor. Get over it. Its looks like it would be a "venom" suit. I know who VENOM is. I am not a spiderman dummy, but neither I am a spiderman fanboy.
Try to not take me so seriously, bloodytears.
try not to sound so pathetic.
Er...try not to be a dick when I'm just trying to explain that it was a joke o_o. I really dont want to go offtopic with this so, I'll end my posts on it here.
EDIT: Joker = favorite villian. Ever.
Post by: Kijuki_Magazaki on August 14, 2006, 03:27:22 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Revolution911
quote: Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
quote: Originally posted by Revolution911
quote: Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
quote: Originally posted by Revolution911
quote: Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
blah to batman and ghost rider. a big blah to wonder woman.
As for the spiderman movie, the main focus will be venom.
Sandman is going to be like the intro villian.you know he'll have problems with him, but then he'll catch the venom suit and kick his butt and then has to fight himself against and the true venom. blah blah.
Omg if I hear one more person call it the "Venom" suit I'm going to shoot SOMETHING.
Its symbiote. SYMBIOTE SUIT. SYMBIOTE + EDDIE = VENOM. JUST LIKE HOW SYMBIOTE + KASADY = CARNAGE.
Dude its just a phrase of metaphor. Get over it. Its looks like it would be a "venom" suit. I know who VENOM is. I am not a spiderman dummy, but neither I am a spiderman fanboy.
Try to not take me so seriously, bloodytears.
try not to sound so pathetic.
Er...try not to be a dick when I'm just trying to explain that it was a joke o_o. I really dont want to go offtopic with this so, I'll end my posts on it here.
w/e.
You didnt sound so innocent, so I suggest to really end your post there if you are gonna be sensitive, cause i do have reel to stand by =D
Post by: Revolution911 on August 14, 2006, 03:35:16 PM
Post by: Kijuki_Magazaki on August 14, 2006, 03:42:53 PM
Post by: Revolution911 on August 14, 2006, 03:46:54 PM
Dont call me sensative. Especially if you go through a mini-mood-swing 2 posts before it. You can shove your reel up your *** if you're going to be a dick about really little things.
Post by: Kijuki_Magazaki on August 14, 2006, 03:52:35 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Revolution911
....
Dont call me sensative. Especially if you go through a mini-mood-swing 2 posts before it. You can shove your reel up your *** if you're going to be a dick about really little things.
I aint mood swinging. I am sorry that you really sounded like a pathetic fan boy, and I had to pointed out; It aint my fault.
You are the one taking this seriously not me. Chill. Sides you ignitiated it =D
Post by: Razor on August 14, 2006, 07:12:23 PM
It take a lot of work to make a Samuel L Jackson film bad. He's like Morgan Freeman, only less narrator.
But whatever. I have been on some bulletin board where besides throw around a bunch of things I've slowly brought here, they've also hyped up the movie with hilarious fake posters and what not.
Post by: Kijuki_Magazaki on August 14, 2006, 07:28:04 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Razor
Also, how the Hell can you not like the looks of Snakes on a Plane?
It take a lot of work to make a Samuel L Jackson film bad. He's like Morgan Freeman, only less narrator.
But whatever. I have been on some bulletin board where besides throw around a bunch of things I've slowly brought here, they've also hyped up the movie with hilarious fake posters and what not.
it just doesnt look good for me. Sure it has SLJ in it, but it looked too CGI'ed. I am willing to bet they used more computer CG than real life snakes.
and think about it; snakes on a plane? WTF?!
I dunno i think is the horrible title that is throwing me off. thye shouldve come up with something more creative like... Sky Horror, or Fear in the Sky.
Snakes on a plane? I think i am having a real proble on judging this one movie by its title. Well i've learned a thing or two from learning stuff in college if you dun have a good title, less ppl will be buyin.
The title and the very fake snakes are driving me to not like the movie =D
Post by: I Have a Sandwich on August 14, 2006, 07:46:49 PM
Post by: Razor on August 14, 2006, 07:55:08 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
quote: Originally posted by Razor
Also, how the Hell can you not like the looks of Snakes on a Plane?
It take a lot of work to make a Samuel L Jackson film bad. He's like Morgan Freeman, only less narrator.
But whatever. I have been on some bulletin board where besides throw around a bunch of things I've slowly brought here, they've also hyped up the movie with hilarious fake posters and what not.
it just doesnt look good for me. Sure it has SLJ in it, but it looked too CGI'ed. I am willing to bet they used more computer CG than real life snakes.
and think about it; snakes on a plane? WTF?!
I dunno i think is the horrible title that is throwing me off. thye shouldve come up with something more creative like... Sky Horror, or Fear in the Sky.
Snakes on a plane? I think i am having a real proble on judging this one movie by its title. Well i've learned a thing or two from learning stuff in college if you dun have a good title, less ppl will be buyin.
The title and the very fake snakes are driving me to not like the movie =D
You sound like the type of person who wouldn't eat Chocolate, no matter how delicious, if was marketed as "Brown Crap".
Post by: Kijuki_Magazaki on August 14, 2006, 07:57:17 PM
Post by: Cosmos on August 14, 2006, 09:19:32 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Revolution911
Joker = favorite villian. Ever.
Agree'd. Also, in advance... keep that crap out of my topic. Thanks. :happy:
Post by: Drace on August 15, 2006, 06:23:14 AM
#2: I'm not looking forward to Snakes on a Plane. I'm looking forward to Snakes, on a train.
Post by: Revolution911 on August 15, 2006, 04:17:48 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Drace
#1: I hate the Joker. Though, I love Mid! WEEEEH!
#2: I'm not looking forward to Snakes on a Plane. I'm looking forward to Snakes, on a train.
The riddler, mofo.
And...ONLY Mid? Are you forgetting someone? ;)
http://www.cbsnews.com/images/2006/06/29/imageac115333-1a31-4013-9072-7468522d424c.jpg
Post by: Weregnome on August 16, 2006, 08:39:19 AM
Razor and me are seeing Snakes on a Plane as soon as it comes out. We can't wait!
EDIT: People haven't heard of Ghost Rider?!
Post by: Cosmos on August 16, 2006, 01:50:41 PM
Post by: Drace on August 16, 2006, 03:28:12 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Revolution911
quote: Originally posted by Drace
#1: I hate the Joker. Though, I love Mid! WEEEEH!
#2: I'm not looking forward to Snakes on a Plane. I'm looking forward to Snakes, on a train.
The riddler, mofo.
And...ONLY Mid? Are you forgetting someone? ;)
http://www.cbsnews.com/images/2006/06/29/imageac115333-1a31-4013-9072-7468522d42...
Here's ten cents dude, buy yourself a funny bone.
Post by: Revolution911 on August 16, 2006, 03:29:20 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Drace
quote: Originally posted by Revolution911
quote: Originally posted by Drace
#1: I hate the Joker. Though, I love Mid! WEEEEH!
#2: I'm not looking forward to Snakes on a Plane. I'm looking forward to Snakes, on a train.
The riddler, mofo.
And...ONLY Mid? Are you forgetting someone? ;)
http://www.cbsnews.com/images/2006/06/29/imageac115333-1a31-4013-9072-7468522d42...
Here's ten cents dude, buy yourself a funny bone.
Nothing "funny" about your bone, Drace. And I think I know why..
http://www.cbsnews.com/images/2006/06/29/imageac115333-1a31-4013-9072-7468522d424c.jpg
;)
Post by: Razor on August 16, 2006, 08:22:20 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Weregnome
I saw the link someone posted (I think Warxe).. an Ironman movie?! W00t!
Razor and me are seeing Snakes on a Plane as soon as it comes out. We can't wait!
EDIT: People haven't heard of Ghost Rider?!
Snakes on a Plane!
Also, Ghost Rider, I do not think so.
Post by: Drace on August 17, 2006, 05:09:40 AM
*Note: See how I'm using niggah and not ******. Yeah, I'm still being nice.
Post by: Cosmos on August 17, 2006, 02:47:17 PM
Post by: Drace on August 17, 2006, 03:35:53 PM
To Kijuki about the name part: Fear in the Sky and Sky Terror... now THAT sounds bad. Sounds way to 50's and corny. Now Snakes on a Plane, that's catchy. :violin:
Post by: Kijuki_Magazaki on August 17, 2006, 05:36:30 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Drace
Oh yeah, sorry Mid, forgot. I WUV MID!!! *hugs Mid*
To Kijuki about the name part: Fear in the Sky and Sky Terror... now THAT sounds bad. Sounds way to 50's and corny. Now Snakes on a Plane, that's catchy. :violin:
I didnt say to give out that name millenium guy, it was just right out examples of other titles that could fit the situation.
snakes on a plane, just sounds down right obvious.
Post by: I Have a Sandwich on August 17, 2006, 05:51:46 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
quote: Originally posted by Drace
Oh yeah, sorry Mid, forgot. I WUV MID!!! *hugs Mid*
To Kijuki about the name part: Fear in the Sky and Sky Terror... now THAT sounds bad. Sounds way to 50's and corny. Now Snakes on a Plane, that's catchy. :violin:
I didnt say to give out that name millenium guy, it was just right out examples of other titles that could fit the situation.
snakes on a plane, just sounds down right obvious.
A movie title's is SUPPOSED to be obvius. How else will you pick it up in the movie store? You don't pick a movie and read the back if the title/cover wasnt interesting.
Spiderman: Its about a man spider. Duh
Ghost Rier: Its about a ghost.. rider. Duh
Godfather: Its about a mafia thing. Duh
Post by: Kijuki_Magazaki on August 17, 2006, 06:34:55 PM
Quote
Originally posted by I Have a Sandwich
quote: Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
quote: Originally posted by Drace
Oh yeah, sorry Mid, forgot. I WUV MID!!! *hugs Mid*
To Kijuki about the name part: Fear in the Sky and Sky Terror... now THAT sounds bad. Sounds way to 50's and corny. Now Snakes on a Plane, that's catchy. :violin:
I didnt say to give out that name millenium guy, it was just right out examples of other titles that could fit the situation.
snakes on a plane, just sounds down right obvious.
A movie title's is SUPPOSED to be obvius. How else will you pick it up in the movie store? You don't pick a movie and read the back if the title/cover wasnt interesting.
Spiderman: Its about a man spider. Duh
Ghost Rier: Its about a ghost.. rider. Duh
Godfather: Its about a mafia thing. Duh
Its too obvious.
There were many good movies who's titles werent as obvious mr sandwhich; Jaws, silence of the lambs, predator, lethal weapon, friday 13th, finding nemo, apollo 13, eight below, among a lot of others.
No, titles *arent* supposed to be obvious. At least not THAT obvious. I am not saying it shouldnt be named that, I am saying that the title sucks for the kind of expection it has. Basically it. The title is supposed to accurately give some sense of waht the movie is about and its theme, or if not make sense in a metaphorical way that still describes the movie to some point, were you want to see the movie.
Snake on a plane; analyse it. yes, by the name its gonna be friggin obvious its about snakes on a plane, but just by the title its doesnt tell you anything else, but the whole movie!. The titanic movies were not named "When the Titanic sunk", well pretty much cause most of the ppl know what the story of the titanic was about. It deserved to be simple. Same with spiderman, and daredevil, and superman; these are things we all know about, that most of the population understands. It doesnt need a more complex title, it deserves to be simple. Seriously if I werent to know anything about the movie, and just heard the title "snakes on a plane" i WOULD think is a 50's movie; its too corny and simple for no reason.. unless theres a comic book about or is based on a true story that 50% of ppl here know about, then i'll shut up.
but otherwise dun talk to me about titles being supposed to be obvious... unless of course they are supposed to be obvious o.O
In fact snakes on a plane gives me this feeling:
Post by: Razor on August 17, 2006, 07:49:49 PM
"Ice Cream? What the Hell? It's cold like ice and has a creamy texture! I DEMAND you change that name to "Resina!""
Post by: Moosetroop11 on August 17, 2006, 07:51:53 PM
Also, as to Spiderman 3, you know what'll happen. "Oh I just got happy together with Mary Jane, now I'm going to bond with a symbiote and push her away. OH THE TEENAGE ANGST"
Post by: I Have a Sandwich on August 17, 2006, 07:53:50 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
quote: Originally posted by I Have a Sandwich
quote: Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
quote: Originally posted by Drace
Oh yeah, sorry Mid, forgot. I WUV MID!!! *hugs Mid*
To Kijuki about the name part: Fear in the Sky and Sky Terror... now THAT sounds bad. Sounds way to 50's and corny. Now Snakes on a Plane, that's catchy. :violin:
I didnt say to give out that name millenium guy, it was just right out examples of other titles that could fit the situation.
snakes on a plane, just sounds down right obvious.
A movie title's is SUPPOSED to be obvius. How else will you pick it up in the movie store? You don't pick a movie and read the back if the title/cover wasnt interesting.
Spiderman: Its about a man spider. Duh
Ghost Rier: Its about a ghost.. rider. Duh
Godfather: Its about a mafia thing. Duh
Its too obvious.
There were many good movies who's titles werent as obvious mr sandwhich; Jaws, silence of the lambs, predator, lethal weapon, friday 13th, finding nemo, apollo 13, eight below, among a lot of others.
No, titles *arent* supposed to be obvious. At least not THAT obvious. I am not saying it shouldnt be named that, I am saying that the title sucks for the kind of expection it has. Basically it. The title is supposed to accurately give some sense of waht the movie is about and its theme, or if not make sense in a metaphorical way that still describes the movie to some point, were you want to see the movie.
Snake on a plane; analyse it. yes, by the name its gonna be friggin obvious its about snakes on a plane, but just by the title its doesnt tell you anything else, but the whole movie!. The titanic movies were not named "When the Titanic sunk", well pretty much cause most of the ppl know what the story of the titanic was about. It deserved to be simple. Same with spiderman, and daredevil, and superman; these are things we all know about, that most of the population understands. It doesnt need a more complex title, it deserves to be simple. Seriously if I werent to know anything about the movie, and just heard the title "snakes on a plane" i WOULD think is a 50's movie; its too corny and simple for no reason.. unless theres a comic book about or is based on a true story that 50% of ppl here know about, then i'll shut up.
but otherwise dun talk to me about titles being supposed to be obvious... unless of course they are supposed to be obvious o.O
In fact snakes on a plane gives me this feeling:
Wow. Simply because of that poster I am looking for that movies torrent. No joke. I would rather wath 1000 cheesy movies than watch one really spectacular 1000 thumbs up reviewed movie.
Post by: Kijuki_Magazaki on August 17, 2006, 08:05:06 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Razor
It bothers me that you can ***** so much about something you haven't even watched, seemingly based on its name alone.
"Ice Cream? What the Hell? It's cold like ice and has a creamy texture! I DEMAND you change that name to "Resina!""
No, you are getting me wrong, I am not saying the movie will suck. I am saying the title sucks big time, and because of it is not in my "to no watch immidiately" list. And also cause the movie itself looks bleh.
Its bothering me you are making dumb childish stupid assumptions for no particular personal reasons like your last sentence... or is there one eh? And also, is good healthy arguments man, learn to take some, you are too stiff.
Quote
Wow. Simply because of that poster I am looking for that movies torrent. No joke. I would rather wath 1000 cheesy movies than watch one really spectacular 1000 thumbs up reviewed movie
Good for you, I respect your opinion, but seem to have missed the point of why i showed you the poster. That movie itself was good, but you didnt expect me to say that huh?
And no you wouldnt rather do that; please you are giving me talk about watching a movie that is getting good ratings.
Quote
I'm not sure I like the idea of the batman begins sequal. The original batman film with Joker is one of my favourite films of all time.
Also, as to Spiderman 3, you know what'll happen. "Oh I just got happy together with Mary Jane, now I'm going to bond with a symbiote and push her away. OH THE TEENAGE ANGST"
If they are gonna make batman movies they should find an actor that can play the part =/ the last dude in the batman movie, id dint like, he just didnt fit the character for me. Adn even tho i dun like clooney much, i think he's good amking the batman movies.
As for spiderman 3, I want to see how these people either ruin the trilogy or make a better one.
Post by: I Have a Sandwich on August 17, 2006, 08:12:39 PM
Quote
Good for you, I respect your opinion, but seem to have missed the point of why i showed you the poster. That movie itself was good, but you didnt expect me to say that huh?
And no you wouldnt rather do that; please you are giving me talk about watching a movie that is getting good ratings.
You just contradicted yourself. You say that you don't care about SoaP because it is so obvious, then say that an obvious titled movie was good. If you had an experience with a similar title being good, why are you so against another like it?
And yes I would. Just because it gets good reviews, doesn't mean its not a cheesy movie. I was trying to describe something like Godfather, Casablanca, Ben Hur or the likes with that statement.
Post by: Kijuki_Magazaki on August 17, 2006, 08:21:56 PM
I am, from a personal view, saying that I do not think the movie will be good, but it is not saying that the movie will be a complete piece of crap cause of it when it comes down to it. Heck it might the best one of the summer/fall, but it will STILL not deprive me for saying "its title sucks BIG time".
The title of the poster is corny and bleh, but the movie for its production age was kinda good. What does that mean? that yeah even bad named movies can be good, but it isnt likely. For the poster i was refering to how the titled sucked.
You keep on thinking i am saying the whole movie will suck for you and everybody else because The title sucks. Will the movie suck as bad as the title? I dont know, but in my POV from the title and previews theres more possibility it will. It might not as for every movie.
Is just not looking that good for me cause of its title and previews.
Godfather, casa blanca werent cheesy movies and they did get good ratings.. so those arent the one you wouldnt watch?
Post by: I Have a Sandwich on August 17, 2006, 08:45:07 PM
Post by: Kijuki_Magazaki on August 17, 2006, 08:50:12 PM
Quote
Originally posted by I Have a Sandwich
Kij, I'm saying this based on the belief that you have some previous knowledge sucgh as Casa and such were good movies. I'm not going to pretend you have no knowledge of such so you can't make a 'clever' reply to them. Yes, they were good movies, we both know it. But just because a movie gets good reviews doesn't mean its not cheesy as is the case in other movies. But yes, I would rather watch 1000 cheesy, corny movies instead of Casablance, Godfather, Ben Hur, Clopatra, etc.
Ok, :P give me an example of 5 cheesy movies you would watch =P
Post by: I Have a Sandwich on August 17, 2006, 08:58:40 PM
Post by: Kijuki_Magazaki on August 17, 2006, 10:14:32 PM
Quote
Originally posted by I Have a Sandwich
Anything thats played on a Saturday afternoon on SciFi channel, Reptilicus, Earth vs The Spider (old one), Flash Gordon, Plan 9 From Outer Space, and Leviathan (Not too old, but I mean, c'mon, genitically altering russian vodka XD). 5 of me faves.
XD nuff said.
My Father rents "cheesy" movies. And I am not talking old ones, but from like actors you dont know and from companies you never heard of. Me and my older brothers pick on him at times xP. But not to worry, he has more way to make fun of us than anybody.
I've seenthe earth vs spider i think; it was quite entertaining if its the one i am thinking of.
Post by: I Have a Sandwich on August 17, 2006, 10:19:11 PM
Post by: Drace on August 18, 2006, 07:42:47 AM
One of my favourite cheesy films ever is Trolls 2. I mean, it's so bad that it's superbly good.