Charas-Project

Off-Topic => All of all! => Topic started by: Cosmos on October 18, 2006, 01:46:39 AM

Title: North Korea...
Post by: Cosmos on October 18, 2006, 01:46:39 AM

think they're gonna try and go for a world war III? It's kinda creepy that they've suddenly decided to make noise. They must be pretty pissed at the sanctions given to them, but wth is a sanction? I know the peaceful place ppl like to be in, but punishment?

Title:
Post by: Glitch on October 18, 2006, 01:53:01 AM

Yeah, it's kinda out of the blue lately.  The sanctions that people are talking about are usually like economic sanctions, like embargos and blockades and what not.  I don't know whether we'll get to WWIII or not, that really all depends on China.  Right now China has control over N. Korea (china provides supplies and money for NK's weapons). It all depends on whether China supports NKorea or the U.N.  

However, even if China doesn't support us, I don't think they'll go to war with us.  If this gets into conflict, it'll be U.N. vs. N.K.

who knows...

Title: Unfortunately...
Post by: aboutasoandthis on October 18, 2006, 01:53:50 AM

The US has over 6000 nuclear weapons in America. I think the government does not want to take over the world, but having a similar World Superpower sounds pretty dangerous. If we get rid of the nukes, then we'll be taken over...that sucks.

Title:
Post by: Cosmos on October 18, 2006, 01:57:09 AM

Listening to the media, it seems china is a bit scared of North korea. So I dun think they're gonna get support from china <.<

I think the american government realized how dangerous nukes were after the bombin in japan, but they wont get rid of it because one, where can they dispose of the wastes? and two, other countries will attempt to take over.

Title:
Post by: SonicChaos7 on October 18, 2006, 01:59:18 AM

What you're thinking about is sanctuary, the safe place and stuff. Sanctions are "a coercive measure adopted usually by several nations acting together against a nation violating international law." (dictionary.com).

And no, I don't think World War III is going to happen. With as much heat as they're catching an as many nations that are eyeing them, they know that if they fire even one nuke, their *** is toast. We we unload on them, with or without nukes, Japan will unload, as will China, and Russia (possibly). So, they know that if they make a move, they're doomed. Their just rattling their sabres, trying to scare people and bully people. It's something they've done for years.

Title:
Post by: Glitch on October 18, 2006, 02:01:09 AM

I haven't watched to much of the news on tv cause they sensationalize everything for ratings.  I've read the articles and stuff like that, and we covered in my Political Science course in college.  I don't know why China would be scared of N.Korea. They essentially have control of them. They supply their cash, weapons, and political support. Not to mention China is the only country on a par with US in terms of power. They could take Korea in a fight, and they would give us a run for our money (they got nukes too)

However, Kim Jong Il has gotten kinda out of control, at this point I'm not sure if he would listen to China.  If he doesn't it's gonna be him vs. U.S. and China... it would suck to be him.

Title:
Post by: Daetyrnis on October 18, 2006, 02:01:50 AM

America doesn't want to get rid of nukes because having them means power.  Other countries have to stop carefully around the US because the US can nuke them.  Metaphorically, it's like having a sheathed sword, and not unsheathing it.

IMO, North Korea just wants to be a power too.  They don't want to live in fear, so they get their own sword.  Testing the missles just shows that they may unsheath the sword if push comes to shove.

I just hope they don't bomb America.  Us peaceful Canadians live too close to the border. >_>

Title:
Post by: I Have a Sandwich on October 18, 2006, 02:03:23 AM

Quote

Originally posted by SonicChaos7
What you're thinking about is sanctuary, the safe place and stuff. Sanctions are "a coercive measure adopted usually by several nations acting together against a nation violating international law." (dictionary.com).

And no, I don't think World War III is going to happen. With as much heat as they're catching an as many nations that are eyeing them, they know that if they fire even one nuke, their *** is toast. We we unload on them, with or without nukes, Japan will unload, as will China, and Russia (possibly). So, they know that if they make a move, they're doomed. Their just rattling their sabres, trying to scare people and bully people. It's something they've done for years.

Exactly. Kim Il is just a midget with a Napoleonic complex. As he said, they're not dumb enough to do that. If they drop a nuke on ANYONE, everyone will take em out. Nuff said.

Title:
Post by: Cosmos on October 18, 2006, 02:06:27 AM

 

Quote

However, Kim Jong Il has gotten kinda out of control, at this point I'm not sure if he would listen to China. If he doesn't it's gonna be him vs. U.S. and China... it would suck to be him.

Even with a small army, there is still the chance of the bigger group getting their asses whooped  :p  Specially if the leader of the smaller group is a nutjob <.<. I was watching Oprah (I watch it once in a while) and they sent that asian chick to north korea as an assistant for a doctor, or something like that. She wasn't allowed to take her cell phone because they believed the u.s. could listen in on converstations. XD. It's believeable to an extent with the invasion of privacy Bush has been doing, but I dunno how I feel about that.

The north koreans really seemed proud of their leader, or maybe it was the fear of being shot on the spot. Who knows...

Title:
Post by: SonicChaos7 on October 18, 2006, 02:12:30 AM

A lot of people in North Korea are scared. The vast majority of money is put into the military. Many people in North Korea are poor and without power and sometimes even food and supplies. It's ridiculous over there. And South Korea wanted to reunite... idiots.

Title:
Post by: I Have a Sandwich on October 18, 2006, 02:13:07 AM

Quote

Originally posted by Midnight

quote:

However, Kim Jong Il has gotten kinda out of control, at this point I'm not sure if he would listen to China. If he doesn't it's gonna be him vs. U.S. and China... it would suck to be him.

Even with a small army, there is still the chance of the bigger group getting their asses whooped  :p  Specially if the leader of the smaller group is a nutjob <.<. I was watching Oprah (I watch it once in a while) and they sent that asian chick to north korea as an assistant for a doctor, or something like that. She wasn't allowed to take her cell phone because they believed the u.s. could listen in on converstations. XD. It's believeable to an extent with the invasion of privacy Bush has been doing, but I dunno how I feel about that.

The north koreans really seemed proud of their leader, or maybe it was the fear of being shot on the spot. Who knows...

Yay, let's all try our hardest to find a reason why Bush is responsible for his madness! Meh.

But it's North Korea. Against the US and the UN. Maybe if it was 2 on 5 the 2 could win, but when its us vs them it aint gonna happen. Hell, a few strategically placed nukes could wipe the while damned country off the globe.

Title:
Post by: Cosmos on October 18, 2006, 02:15:30 AM

Just a thought thrown into the air, what if they did. Maybe countries and what not would move and crash into each other? I mean, the land we're on isn't even connected to the sea floor and we're always moving.

Title:
Post by: DragonBlaze on October 18, 2006, 02:15:56 AM

Yeah.. Kim is a little insane, he shot fishers that were fishing too close to his private cottage once, he poofs his hair up because he's insecure about his height, and theres a lot of other stuff. But yeah...

Everyone with nukes realizes that if they use them, nukes will be used back on them. If north korea WOULD use a nuke, they'd be dead. Just having a nukes gives them power though.

Really though, who are we to say who can and can't have nukes.

Title:
Post by: I Have a Sandwich on October 18, 2006, 02:18:40 AM

Quote

Originally posted by Midnight
Just a thought thrown into the air, what if they did. Maybe countries and what not would move and crash into each other? I mean, the land we're on isn't even connected to the sea floor and we're always moving.

.......Did you even take earth science? The reason countries are moving is because of the tectonic plates floating on the earths crust are shifting. Every landmass is connected to these plates, and the ocean rests on top of them. Plus these movements takes millions of years to occur. Its I believe an inch a year, and thats when its fast.

Title:
Post by: Cosmos on October 18, 2006, 02:21:18 AM

Um earth science was a bore <.< I was watching the discovery channel. WHICH IS THE ALL KNOWNING GOD. And it was said that we're technically moving. Aside from the plates or whatever.  :bee_wtf:

Title:
Post by: I Have a Sandwich on October 18, 2006, 02:23:45 AM

Quote

Originally posted by Midnight
Um earth science was a bore <.< I was watching the discovery channel. WHICH IS THE ALL KNOWNING GOD. And it was said that we're technically moving. Aside from the plates or whatever.  :bee_wtf:

Not fast enough to affect a single war. It's not like the earth twitches and we go full frontal.

Title:
Post by: Shady Ultima on October 18, 2006, 02:34:30 AM

World War III will happen, within the next 10 years most likely.
I forget who said it, but there is a quote "I'm not sure how world war III will be fought, but world war IV will be fought with sticks and stones."

Title:
Post by: I Have a Sandwich on October 18, 2006, 02:40:42 AM

If you believe in the concept of the Doomsday Clock, thats not far off.

Title:
Post by: Glitch on October 18, 2006, 02:41:50 AM

Quote

Originally posted by Shady Ultima
World War III will happen, within the next 10 years most likely.
I forget who said it, but there is a quote "I'm not sure how world war III will be fought, but world war IV will be fought with sticks and stones."

Yeah, and people also said that World War One would be the war to end all wars... yeah....

World War III will probably eventually happen, but it'll just be another war.  Regardless of all the doomsday predictions, most countries are smart enough to avoid nuclear holocaust and what not.  Even little ol Kim.  

Speaking of Kim, did you know he has a huge flair for the theatric and dramatic?  When Madelyn albrite visited him in N.Korea he directed a performance in her honor, like, song and dance kind of performance...

Title:
Post by: SaiKar on October 18, 2006, 02:55:42 AM

To clear up a few things...

1) Economic sanctions are effectively refusing to buy or sell with a country. A lot people make fun of sanctions as a weak "slap on the wrist" type way of punishing an offense, but in reality and with the world a global market, lots of people being unwilling to trade with your country is a pretty big deal.

2) China is annoyed by North Korea because they know that if the N. Koreans ever get scared, they'll be flooding into China as refugees. China is already having a tough time supporting its current population; too many newcomers and their economy would be very horribly strained.

And yeah, it is pretty scary stuff. Of course, we've known they have been working on nuclear weaons for, what, 12 years now? But now they're making a big show of it. Let's all hope Kim Jong isn't as crazy as he looks.

Title:
Post by: MrMister on October 18, 2006, 03:42:40 AM

World War 3 won't be another regular war, it will be nuclear. That's pretty much guaranteed, and it's scary. That's why America is terrorizing other countries. Because we'll die if they don't.

Title:
Post by: Osmose on October 18, 2006, 04:25:07 AM

Quote

Originally posted by SaiKar
2) China is annoyed by North Korea because they know that if the N. Koreans ever get scared, they'll be flooding into China as refugees. China is already having a tough time supporting its current population; too many newcomers and their economy would be very horribly strained.

This is actually a big reason why North Korea has been able to get this far - China is very wary of supporting anything more than a symbollic punishment because they will get screwed with the refugees.

One of the interesting things to note is that analysts have studied the data from the first test and many have been reporting that the measurements match up with a dud, not a successful test.

North Korea is flooded with propaganda for their leader. Many of the people who support their leader in that country are not scared of him - rather, they have been told all their lives that he is totally sweet, and have no reason to not believe it - they have no reference point for a non-crazy leader.

Title:
Post by: Razor on October 18, 2006, 05:11:32 AM

Heh, me Weregnome and Jawzz have been making North Korea jokes all day.

In the vein of "Hey, what's that sound?"
"Oh, it's just North Korea nuking us."

Good times.

Title:
Post by: Black Massacre on October 18, 2006, 05:38:08 AM

Kim is like a Hilter two. XD!

Title:
Post by: Drace on October 18, 2006, 05:41:52 AM

Team America, anyone?

Title:
Post by: Weregnome on October 18, 2006, 07:56:57 AM

Quote

Originally posted by Drace
Team America, anyone?

Thats the reason they are pissed off. Kim saw the movie and got angry. His hair fuzzed up more

Title:
Post by: Drace on October 18, 2006, 10:31:53 AM

Quote

Originally posted by MrMister
World War 3 won't be another regular war, it will be nuclear. That's pretty much guaranteed, and it's scary. That's why America is terrorizing other countries. Because we'll die if they don't.

Like the Cold War? Which worked out good, seeing as we're still alive.

Title:
Post by: Cosmos on October 18, 2006, 01:28:07 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Glitch
Regardless of all the doomsday predictions, most countries are smart enough to avoid nuclear holocaust and what not.  Even little ol Kim.  

Yet some are crazy enough to go through with their threats <.<

Title:
Post by: WarxePB on October 18, 2006, 02:01:59 PM

My bet is that Iran is borrowing the tech from NK, so they're probably in league with each other. Two countries with nukes is a whole lot worse than one, but I don't think it'll start WW3 or anything.

Speaking of which, Shady, I said the WW4 will be fought with sticks quote. Got it from somewhere, but don't remember where.

Title:
Post by: Apex on October 18, 2006, 02:26:40 PM

We should fire all of the worlds nukes at the sun.

One problem solved.

Title:
Post by: Cosmos on October 18, 2006, 02:36:09 PM

BIG BANG!! :D

Title:
Post by: Dragonium on October 18, 2006, 02:36:23 PM

There's been a lot of anti-NK propaganda all over the place, nigh on none of it justified. Team America, Die Another Day and Mercenaries to name three.

There'll always be another crazy leader somewhere. If people aren't worrying about what the leader of a country is doing, they'll be worrying about what the leader of a different country is doing. It's only natural for people to worry about one thing or the other.

However, Mercenaries has taught us that if North Korea does become a warzone, the situation will eventually be solved by a single person who manages to use their endless supply of munitions to take out every minor entity in the country within a few days. They will have unlimited help from the UN, South Koreans, Chinese and the Russian Mafia.

As to the quotes, it was Albert Einstein who said the thing about sticks and stones.

What I find interesting is Nostradamus (For those who haven't heard of him, he was a prophet who made many predictions about the future, some of which are correct - for example, he is thought to have predicted JFK's assassination, World War II and the World Trade Centre attack). One of his prophecies said that around this time of the century, "a great war will be fought with ancient weapons". The way I interpret this is that nuclear weapons are ancient enough - most of the universe was created by a nuclear explosion ("The Big Bang"), so nuclear weapons are about as ancient as weapons can possibly get. Makes sense, no?

Another interesting thing is that the Bible Codes (Google it, it'd take too long for me to explain) said the same thing as Nostradamus a number of years later.

So yeah, I reckon something is going to happen, but whether it'll be on as great a scale as it's thought to be will be left to chance. Let's hope it's nothing.

Title:
Post by: SaiKar on October 18, 2006, 04:06:23 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Dragonium
What I find interesting is Nostradamus (For those who haven't heard of him, he was a prophet who made many predictions about the future, some of which are correct - for example, he is thought to have predicted JFK's assassination, World War II and the World Trade Centre attack). One of his prophecies said that around this time of the century, "a great war will be fought with ancient weapons". The way I interpret this is that nuclear weapons are ancient enough - most of the universe was created by a nuclear explosion ("The Big Bang"), so nuclear weapons are about as ancient as weapons can possibly get. Makes sense, no?

See, this is the kind of bullcrap that made Nostradamus popular - people willing to make insane jumps of logic in order to try to make him correct. No, nuclear weapons aren't ancient. They're less than a hundred years old. Just because the force of nuclear weapons exists somewhere else in the universe doesn't mean they are ancient weapons. If someone breaks out siege capapults flinging rocks and calvalry charges by steel armored men with lances, that might be ancent, but not nuclear weapons. God.

Title:
Post by: Drace on October 18, 2006, 04:22:19 PM

Quote

Originally posted by SaiKar
If someone breaks out siege capapults flinging rocks and calvalry charges by steel armored men with lances

Now that's war. Not the pussy wars of nowadays of people playing with guns. Bah. Give back the knights! Swords! Other ancient awesome painmachines!

Title:
Post by: Dragonium on October 18, 2006, 04:30:56 PM

Medieval culture, weapons etc. are hardly ancient. We're talking a few hundred years. Whereas, with nuclear energy, it's been around literally, or at least virtually, forever. The universe was created from nuclear energy, therefore nuclear energy is as ancient as we can get. While the actual weapons might have only been created recently, the energy associated with them has been around much longer.

Nostradamus never told anyone exactly what he meant, but we can interpret his words and make out own educated guesses. People knew nuclear energy existed back in those days, but they didn't know how to explain it. We can only speculate that Nostradamus was doing just that. Like you say, jumps of logic, but those which have genuine significance.

Another of his prophecies was that one day men would build metal birds and fly inside them. While I've never seen a giant bird-droid flapping about, any fool with a handful of brain cells can see exactly what he's talking about.

Anyway, we're getting way off topic.

China gives support to North Korea. North Korea threatens other countries which China "likes". China threatens to cut off support. North Korea makes more threats. Vicious cycle, no?

Title:
Post by: Osmose on October 18, 2006, 05:41:58 PM

Nostradamus said "ancient weapons", right? Well you said yourself the weapons aren't ancient.  Nuclear reactions have existed for billions of years, but nuclear weapons haven't.

Nostradamus is just as credible as the horoscope.

Title:
Post by: Dragonium on October 18, 2006, 06:40:53 PM

That's to say that his definition of a "weapon" is different from ours. Nowadays a definition of a word comes along and it becomes a standard, and what was correct before is now wrong. The way I see it is that when something is re-used to create something else, it takes on that purpose. So, nuclear energy was harmless and useless before people started making weapons with it, but afterwards nuclear energy was, due to its use, a weapon.

If a bomb goes off and nobody is killed, is it still a weapon?

Anyway, I'm done on the subject.

Title:
Post by: Drace on October 18, 2006, 07:24:29 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Dragonium
If a bomb goes off and nobody is killed, is it still a weapon?

Of course it is.

But if some allalalalalalaaah dude from farawaykistan places SOME of the components of the bomb under the White House, it's not a weapon.

Title:
Post by: Almeidaboo on October 18, 2006, 07:33:07 PM

Need I start my "USA likes to have bombs and be able to destroy (and dislikes that other countries also have them) the world even though they´re the only ones the ever used these weapons without responsability" or you all already know about north america hipocrisy?

No need? Ok, thanks.

Title:
Post by: drenrin2120 on October 18, 2006, 07:58:15 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Drace

quote:

Originally posted by SaiKar If someone breaks out siege capapults flinging rocks and calvalry charges by steel armored men with lances

Now that's war. Not the ***** wars of nowadays of people playing with guns. Bah. Give back the knights! Swords! Other ancient awesome painmachines!

Just want to say this, wars today are probably more scary now then ever. People willing to blow themselves up to kill you, weapons like missiles and rockets that hunt you down. Plus all the bio-chemical weapons that countries aren't allowed to use but just may if they get desperate. Let's face it, if there was a war between, say Russia and the US. It would be horrendously vicious and scary. Or even a war between France and England. Any war between two powerful countries now a days would be devestating, more so then any other wars before. Anyone or any coutnry for this matter, is capable of anything when they get desperate. Someone always gets desperate at some point in a war.

Title:
Post by: DeusExMachina on October 18, 2006, 08:11:23 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Midnight
think they're gonna try and go for a world war III? It's kinda creepy that they've suddenly decided to make noise.

Quote

Originally posted by Glitch
Yeah, it's kinda out of the blue lately.  

I hate to say this, but NK didnt all of  a sudden become a threat to national security. The American government funded  NK's militarization over the last 50 years. So did China. Its definatly not an 'out of the blue thing'.


Smoke an' mirrors.

Title:
Post by: dinkler on October 18, 2006, 08:18:22 PM

I doubt that N. Korea will launch a nuke at us, because we've got 2600 more than anybody else. XD

Title:
Post by: I Have a Sandwich on October 18, 2006, 08:41:30 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Dragonium
That's to say that his definition of a "weapon" is different from ours. Nowadays a definition of a word comes along and it becomes a standard, and what was correct before is now wrong. The way I see it is that when something is re-used to create something else, it takes on that purpose. So, nuclear energy was harmless and useless before people started making weapons with it, but afterwards nuclear energy was, due to its use, a weapon.

If a bomb goes off and nobody is killed, is it still a weapon?

Anyway, I'm done on the subject.

A weapon is, and has been for 1000s of years, been a tool made or used by one sentient being to harm another. If I pick up a rock and throw it at you, the rock is a weapon. If I make a bomb and detonate it with intent to kill someone, whether they die or not it is still a weapon. If I make a bomb with the intention to blow a tunnel through a mountain, it is a tool, not a weapon.

Title:
Post by: DeusExMachina on October 18, 2006, 08:55:38 PM

A thought to ponder.




Words are a pretty ancient weapon.


Another ancient weapon, is religion.

Title:
Post by: I Have a Sandwich on October 18, 2006, 09:01:56 PM

Post the whole thing about that crap here. I bet I can decipher it in any way I like. WHen you only say a small section, you can skew the meaning with lack of info.

Title:
Post by: Daetyrnis on October 18, 2006, 09:40:22 PM

Nuclear energy is not an ancient weapon.  The most ancient weapon enery form is kinetic.  AKA moving.  I other words, something hitting someone.  I would bet punching as a weapon was developed before nuclear bombs were.  Just a hunch.

Title:
Post by: Cosmos on October 18, 2006, 09:48:46 PM

Quote

Post the whole thing about that crap here. I bet I can decipher it in any way I like. WHen you only say a small section, you can skew the meaning with lack of info.

It's true.

Title:
Post by: Kinslayer on October 19, 2006, 12:22:23 AM

I seriously think that North Korea is a threat to security. And also think that the US's got nuclear weapons so they should just shut their pyholes and tear them apart. No one should have that kind of power.

Title:
Post by: I Have a Sandwich on October 19, 2006, 12:27:55 AM

Quote

Originally posted by Kinslayer
I seriously think that North Korea is a threat to security. And also think that the US's got nuclear weapons so they should just shut their pyholes and tear them apart. No one should have that kind of power.

So, you think that the US should tear apart its missles so that North Korea has no fear of launching theirs? Thats a smart idea.

Title:
Post by: Osmose on October 19, 2006, 12:36:59 AM

Quick thing I wanted to say to Dragonium: By your logic, medival weapons are, in fact, ancient, because there was iron and steel and the elements used to make a sword millions upon millions of years ago, they just weren't specifically shaped into a weapon.

As for nuclear disarmament, it's a rough issue. The only plausible way for one nation, like America, to disarm it's nuclear weapons is to make sure every other country disarms as well. If even one person has the technology, there will be fighting and arguing saying that we need to bulk up to protect ourselves from them.

Title:
Post by: I Have a Sandwich on October 19, 2006, 12:40:54 AM

Quote

Originally posted by Osmose
Quick thing I wanted to say to Dragonium: By your logic, medival weapons are, in fact, ancient, because there was iron and steel and the elements used to make a sword millions upon millions of years ago, they just weren't specifically shaped into a weapon.

As for nuclear disarmament, it's a rough issue. The only plausible way for one nation, like America, to disarm it's nuclear weapons is to make sure every other country disarms as well. If even one person has the technology, there will be fighting and arguing saying that we need to bulk up to protect ourselves from them.

Exactly, and that would require world peacem which is about as likely to happen as Rosie O'Donnell NOT being a dyke.

Title:
Post by: Kinslayer on October 19, 2006, 01:26:48 AM

Quote

Originally posted by I Have a Sandwich

quote:

Originally posted by Kinslayer I seriously think that North Korea is a threat to security. And also think that the US's got nuclear weapons so they should just shut their pyholes and tear them apart. No one should have that kind of power.

So, you think that the US should tear apart its missles so that North Korea has no fear of launching theirs? Thats a smart idea.

xD nah, I meant that EVERYONE SHOULD tear apart their missiles, and said that Bush's gov has nothing to say about "frets", because they have nuclear weapons as well, and should have destroyed them. I wrote it quite poorly, but that's what I meant.

Title:
Post by: MrMister on October 19, 2006, 01:43:19 AM

1 vital difference between the Cold War and this one.. Asians are retarded.

Title:
Post by: Drace on October 19, 2006, 04:40:08 AM

Quote

Originally posted by MrMister
1 vital difference between the Cold War and this one.. Asians are retarded.

Correction: Koreans are r-tards.

Title:
Post by: Linkizcool on October 19, 2006, 02:21:07 PM

Then how come they're so smart?

Title:
Post by: SonicChaos7 on October 19, 2006, 02:37:10 PM

First clarify which Koreans you're talking about. North Koreans as a whole pretty much are. South Koreans are smart, just dumb for wanting to reunite with the North. Take into account that I am half-South Korean.

Title:
Post by: Almeidaboo on October 19, 2006, 03:41:34 PM

We should all make sex instead of war. Course, Charas would be empty, but it would be for a good cause.

Title:
Post by: Cosmos on October 19, 2006, 04:06:20 PM

So does that mean there will be a lot of gay sex going on?  :corn:

Title:
Post by: Drace on October 19, 2006, 06:16:54 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Midnight
So does that mean there will be a lot of gay sex going on?  :corn:

Perhaps. But I'd prefer you.

Title:
Post by: Almeidaboo on October 19, 2006, 06:32:18 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Midnight
So does that mean there will be a lot of gay sex going on?  :corn:

The smiley in the end of your post makes me wonder the kinda thing you like...

Anyway, my answer is: God NO!

Title:
Post by: Cosmos on October 19, 2006, 06:40:20 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Drace

quote:

Originally posted by Midnight So does that mean there will be a lot of gay sex going on?  :corn:

Perhaps. But I'd prefer you.

*huggles*

XD!! It's my job to keep you wondering. ^_^

Title:
Post by: drenrin2120 on October 19, 2006, 07:20:25 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Almeidaboo

quote:

Originally posted by Midnight So does that mean there will be a lot of gay sex going on?  :corn:

The smiley in the end of your post makes me wonder the kinda thing you like...

Anyway, my answer is: God NO!

As long as Almeidaboo keeps that paper bag on his head...

<.<
>.>

Title:
Post by: Robotam Plus on October 19, 2006, 07:30:30 PM

Cyber gay sex... Interesting off-topic subject. :p

Title:
Post by: Almeidaboo on October 19, 2006, 07:53:33 PM

Quote

Originally posted by drenrin2120

quote:

Originally posted by Almeidaboo quote: Originally posted by Midnight So does that mean there will be a lot of gay sex going on?  :corn: The smiley in the end of your post makes me wonder the kinda thing you like... Anyway, my answer is: God NO!

As long as Almeidaboo keeps that paper bag on his head...

<.<
>.>

Oh my Dren, I never looked at you this way....

 :blush:

Title:
Post by: Moosetroop11 on October 19, 2006, 08:03:33 PM

I'm feeling relatively safe, actually. If a nuke is fired It'll be fired at America to try and disable American missile systems. I see no tactical reason why they'd go for us first.

Selfishness over, it is very worrying. Both the fact that NK have functional nuclear weapons and the topic turn this thread has taken.

Title:
Post by: Cosmos on October 19, 2006, 09:40:38 PM

LOL, xD agree'd.

Title:
Post by: Shady Ultima on October 20, 2006, 01:43:20 AM

Quote

Originally posted by Dragonium
There's been a lot of anti-NK propaganda all over the place, nigh on none of it justified. Team America, Die Another Day and Mercenaries to name three.

There is, but they get nothing compared to the french. If theres any country that should go out of control its them.

Title:
Post by: Cosmos on October 20, 2006, 01:48:58 AM

Team america... that stupid movie with the dolls..? o.o

Title:
Post by: Drace on October 20, 2006, 09:43:17 AM

Quote

Originally posted by Midnight
Team america... that stupid movie with the dolls..? o.o

How can you break my heart like that? Team America pwns, Matt and Trey pwn.

Title:
Post by: Cosmos on October 20, 2006, 01:35:39 PM

I never saw it..? Sorry dracie, but it looked lame. <.<

Title:
Post by: Drace on October 20, 2006, 06:12:59 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Midnight
I never saw it..? Sorry dracie, but it looked lame. <.<

Sure, it looks lame. But the comedy! It's like... another South Park movie with puppets, terrorist and a team that fights them.

Title:
Post by: Cosmos on October 20, 2006, 06:20:45 PM

Blame canada... *sings* OH erm.. <.< maybe I'll see it when it's on cable <.<

Title:
Post by: Meiscool-2 on October 20, 2006, 07:00:29 PM

Puppet Sex FTW.