Charas-Project

Off-Topic => All of all! => Topic started by: fruckert on September 01, 2009, 04:30:06 AM

Title: ...what?
Post by: fruckert on September 01, 2009, 04:30:06 AM
So, apparently the shitty company known as Disney ate Marvel (http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/31/breaking-disney-to-acquire-marvel-entertainment-for-4-billion).
...
This move baffles me.
I mean...Disney+Marvel=/=sense, no matter what way you cut it.
I mean...wth.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Apex on September 01, 2009, 04:55:02 AM
Good, now we can just avoid both labels in one blow.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Uberpwn_w00t on September 01, 2009, 05:06:15 AM
No...

DAMN YOU DISNEY

DAMN YOU TO HELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Bluhman on September 01, 2009, 05:06:22 AM
......

LOL. WUT.

That is a mindblowing merger. Now kingdom hearts 3 can have spiderman and wolverine in it. AND IT WILL STILL SUCK.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Archem on September 01, 2009, 05:59:09 AM
It's not like Marvel is gonna start sticking Mickey in everything. It just means that Disney now helps foot the bill for anything Marvel puts out. You gotta look at it from a business standpoint if you want to make sense out of it.

Also, WB has been kicking *** with DC super hero films. Marvel has been doing the same, and Disney thinks it's time to try to get in on the action. From Marvel's point of view, this is great news. I mean, now all they have to do is handle the IP and source material and that kind of ****, and Disney does all the film work, advertising, and pays half the costs of production.

Sure, it's an odd match-up, but it's not exactly a bad thing. Open your minds, people.

Also, I still don't get why some of you insist that KH sucks.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Bluhman on September 01, 2009, 06:09:02 AM
Maybe, but did anyone ever really see it coming? I've seen plenty of company mergers between really odd things that haven't had much impact on what each part produced... But I can't really think of what those mergers are, right now.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Prpl_Mage on September 01, 2009, 06:41:23 AM
Square enix.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Archem on September 01, 2009, 07:25:55 AM
Activision-Blizzard?

But at least these two were game companies. Square Enix was in a similar situation, since both were Japanese game companies who were well known for their RPGs.

But Bluhman's right. I can't imagine anyone saw this one coming. Not sure that matters, but whatever.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: supasora on September 01, 2009, 07:35:30 AM
......

LOL. WUT.

That is a mindblowing merger. Now kingdom hearts 3 can have spiderman and wolverine in it. AND IT WILL STILL SUCK.
You make me sad. KH2 is my favoritest game ever... except the part were they cut all of the cool voilent stuff out of the english version. Like the sniper rifle.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Razor on September 01, 2009, 09:46:01 AM
This better not effect Spectacular Spiderman on any level.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Rahl on September 01, 2009, 12:26:31 PM
I really hope disney doesn't dull down the violence... Disney is pretty well known for that.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: X_marks_the_ed on September 01, 2009, 12:33:55 PM
I really hope disney doesn't dull down the violence... Disney will do that and hide the word sex in everything.

Fixed.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Apex on September 01, 2009, 01:35:37 PM
You make me sad. KH2 is my favoritest game ever... except the part were they cut all of the cool voilent stuff out of the english version. Like the sniper rifle.

I have the Japanese version. I don't remember that. Matter of fact, I don't really remember much difference at all.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: MissingName on September 01, 2009, 02:29:03 PM
...sigh.  It's a shame.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Grandy on September 01, 2009, 02:53:35 PM
Good things out of it:

Next Kingdom hearts may have Spiderman.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Cerebus on September 01, 2009, 05:19:02 PM
Fixed.

Wasn't it Disney that had sexual reference hidden in their movies?
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Grandy on September 01, 2009, 05:43:52 PM
Wasn't it Disney that had sexual reference hidden in their movies?

So? I have sexual reference hidden everywhere.

Yesterday I had a sexual reference hidden in a woman.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Cerebus on September 01, 2009, 06:07:45 PM
Because the "fixed" included:
Disney will do that and hide the word sex in everything.

But now that I think about it, you're right, they will have the word sex hidden somewhere.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Archem on September 01, 2009, 08:17:08 PM
I really hope disney doesn't dull down the violence... Disney is pretty well known for that.
Once again, It's pretty much a shared name/IP. Marvel will still be Marvel as always, but with a little credit at the end of their work that says "Disney", and they can do what they want for a little bit cheaper.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Ben on September 01, 2009, 08:29:04 PM
this is a sad day.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: lilsniffs3 on September 01, 2009, 09:07:39 PM
Does this mean no more Batman TAS on Disney XD? OH NOES! THAT WAS THE ONLY THING IT WAS GOOD FOR NOOOOOOOOOO!

Also, Spiderman 4 will now have subliminal messaging in the skies and will suck worse now considering how bad Disney movies are, and how bad Spiderman 3 is.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: fruckert on September 01, 2009, 09:12:16 PM
OH NOES! THAT WAS THE ONLY THING IT WAS GOOD FOR NOOOOOOOOOO!
...Gargoyles?
Anyone?
Hello?
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: lilsniffs3 on September 01, 2009, 09:21:24 PM
Gargoyles was inspired by Batman TAS. Without Batman, there would be no Gargoyles.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: fruckert on September 01, 2009, 09:23:56 PM
Touche.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: lilsniffs3 on September 01, 2009, 09:33:03 PM
They most likely are.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Rahl on September 01, 2009, 10:26:20 PM
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
*cries. a lot*

Lately Disney hasnt done anything good. And now they get to own marvel? Oh well. :/

Puirates of Carribian movies were just awesome.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: lilsniffs3 on September 01, 2009, 10:31:58 PM
If you think that, you are dead in the head.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Archem on September 01, 2009, 11:10:39 PM
Says the fella with a zombie avatar.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Zerlina on September 01, 2009, 11:14:27 PM
So...DC everyone?

DC.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Archem on September 01, 2009, 11:33:19 PM
Yeah, **** them and their WB pimp. Right?
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Zerlina on September 01, 2009, 11:42:31 PM
...oy...
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: lilsniffs3 on September 02, 2009, 12:06:39 AM
Says the fella with a zombie avatar.

Part Zombie Part Ninja!





...part pirate part robot.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Rahl on September 02, 2009, 12:25:48 AM
If you think that, you are dead in the head.

I don't think I've ever  heard anyone but you say POC was bad... seriously.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Cerebus on September 02, 2009, 12:28:30 AM
POC as in Piece Of Crap lololol

Wait, I actually did like the movies.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Red Giant on September 02, 2009, 12:32:35 AM
I don't think I've ever  heard anyone but you say POC was bad... seriously.
I liked 1, 2 bored me and I literally had to leave the theatre halfway through 3.

The only thing that could revive that series would be a sequel in which Captain Jack undergoes an operation in which he is given an adamantium skeleton and will turner and keira whatever die for some reason and it's just two hours of johnny depp cutting people up.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Archem on September 02, 2009, 12:38:16 AM
Well, now that Disney is half-Marvel (mergers work both ways, people), this isn't too far from reality.

Write them a letter.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Rahl on September 02, 2009, 01:01:46 AM
I think its a takeover rather than a merger, disney did pay them 4 billion and disney didnt get a dime, so it can't really be a collaberative merger.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Shady Ultima on September 02, 2009, 01:18:39 AM
Hooray, Marvel is going to make better movies!

I mean, they couldn't make any worse than they have. And Disney's worst movie is better than Xmen-origins, the Hulk (the first time) and Punisher.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: lilsniffs3 on September 02, 2009, 02:23:24 AM
Hannah Montana was a GREAT MOVIE!!! erhm, I mean, yeah, that movie sucked.
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Archem on September 02, 2009, 03:33:23 AM
I think its a takeover rather than a merger, disney did pay them 4 billion and disney didnt get a dime, so it can't really be a collaberative merger.
Call it "convincing". After all, the company will be referred to as "Disney-Marvel".
Title: Re: ...what?
Post by: Rahl on September 02, 2009, 05:10:26 AM
That branch of disney anyway. Also...

Hooray, Marvel is going to make better movies!

I mean, they couldn't make any worse than they have. And Disney's worst movie is better than Xmen-origins, the Hulk (the first time) and Punisher.

You think the first punisher movie sucked??????? Whats wrong with you man?!