Charas-Project
Off-Topic => All of all! => Topic started by: Valiere on February 09, 2011, 12:20:27 AM
-
I saw a print ad for this guy:
http://www.brucesfox.com/index.htm
Yeah, with the creepy anthropomorphic fox portrait and everything.
Maybe he's a werefox who is courteously showing us both his human and beast forms so we'll recognize him next time we need a DWI defense.
Or maybe he just has no idea how incredibly stupid that looks.
-
I actually served on a jury where the defendant both refused to talk the cop without his lawyer present AND refused to take a breathalyzer test, and we STILL let him off.
-
I prefer Harvey Birdman.
-
...why?
Not enough evidence.
-
That's how law works in Good America.
-
George Clooney did it better.
-
You know, that movie was awesome.
-
That's how law works in Good America.
At least it's not as bad as Phoenix Wright
-
...why?
Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial.
-
Yea, innocent until proven guilty. So, unless you can prove guilt (not just feel it), the person walks. Sure, there's a level of flaw, but it mostly works. And when a guilty person gets off because of a lack of evidence, I get this happy feeling inside. The same kind I get when I have a glass of orange juice.
I had to struggle with some sort of recent dyslexia difficulty I've been having. I kept typing "quilt", which won't be caught by spellcheck.
Ironically, "spellcheck" has a red squiggly line under it.
Also, I hope someone sees what I did back there.
-
Ironically, "spellcheck" has a red squiggly line under it.
So it does.
Innocent until proven guilty may be flawed, but it works better than guilty until proven innocent.
-
But what about the twist endings where, even though the accused is a scumbag, they're innocent?
-
...why?
I think law and legal rights here work differently then you think.
Sure, the cop will think you are up to no good if you ask for a lawyer...but the cop is not a judge, or jury.
Even saying something like "I was just passing by and I saw this dead cat" can **** you over without legal presence.
Trust Ben. I was a carreer drug dealer for years, and Ive never spent more then one night in jail. And that was because I was drunk in public.
Mind you, this was before my time at charas.
-
Lucas, you're wrong. On to the next chapter of this thread.
-
That meant "end of discussion, you don't seem to get what you're talking about".
-
Always ask for a lawyer if you have one. Rather safe than sorry. Say something silly or stupid and they might just get the wrong idea.
-
What about innocent until everyone knows you're guilty even if there's no proof?
How does everyone know if there's no proof?
-
So, how 'bout that Fox painting?
Hilarious, 'eh?
-
It sucks.
-
Christ, Val.
-
Cops can be crooked. That's why you may want to seek legal advice. Example: cop pulls you over for a loud exhaust. He wants to search your trunk. You say no because you're in a hurry and done nothing. You have a right to say no. Cop says he smells pot. You no longer have a right. Regardless of existence of proposed pot smell.
I like cops. I'm glad they're their, but they can suck.
They can suck as much as that fox or as much as lucas.
-
And as much as not playing M-you know what?
No.
Just, no.
-
It's not what you know. It's what you can prove. Or what the furry can prove.
-
Cops can be crooked. That's why you may want to seek legal advice. Example: cop pulls you over for a loud exhaust. He wants to search your trunk. You say no because you're in a hurry and done nothing. You have a right to say no. Cop says he smells pot. You no longer have a right. Regardless of existence of proposed pot smell.
I like cops. I'm glad they're their, but they can suck.
They can suck as much as that fox or as much as lucas.
I like cops. I'm glad they're their, but they can suck.
I'm glad they're their
they're their
their
...
-
Ouch.
ed: Apparently this was my 6666th post.
Hail Satan, and all that bull.
-
Haha, I couldn't help it. haha
-
It sads you*
-
God damn it.
GOD DAMN IT.
God DAMN it.
That was the first thing that came to mind.
Also, I actually visited charas on my computer for the first time in a few weeks today, and dear god, can we please motion to ban that picture as an avatar?
-
What picture? Fruckerts? Why?
-
*val's picture as an avatar
-
Oh, that. I'm indifferent.
-
About Val or the picture?
-
I oppose this motion.
-
About Val or the picture?
The picture. I'm pro-Val.
...That wounds like a cool screen name. "proVal".
-
It is easy to use, yet powerful to perform many types of profile analyses.
-
Ask your doctor if Proval is right for you
-
What are the side effects of Proval?
-
Ginger hypertrichosis, and the violent urge to lick your testicles (even if you don't have any)
-
(http://i55.tinypic.com/ojgmdx.png)
Well, close enough. I'm pretty sure derailing is included, somehow.
-
I take it that I'm late?
-
-Off-topic-
Now that I've seen that image more than once, how long has that tally been going, Archem?
-On-topic-
I support ProVAL.
-Actually on-topic-
I guess I'm the only one who finds Valiere's avatar choice more humorous than creepy... Well at least I think if I find it humorous, it won't haunt my dreams.
-
Now that I've seen that image more than once, how long has that tally been going, Archem?
I have no idea. Dragonium posted it a while ago, and I dug it up because it was semi-relevant.
-
I guess I'm the only one who finds Valiere's avatar choice more humorous than creepy... Well at least I think if I find it humorous, it won't haunt my dreams.
Personally, I find it a mix of humorous and creepy. It's kind of uncanny, but if I look at it for too long, I start laughing my *** off.
-
The fox is just trying so hard to look respectable.
-
He looks like he's about to start laughing.
-
He looks like that collar is way too tight for his neck, though it could be all of the POOFY fur. The poor dear.
-
Yeah, I think so, too.