Charas-Project

Off-Topic => All of all! => Topic started by: Prpl_Mage on February 26, 2013, 01:16:28 AM

Title: So...
Post by: Prpl_Mage on February 26, 2013, 01:16:28 AM
Anyone think that Ps4 is worth getting yet?

I'm not overly impressed so far, just seems like another console with high-graphics and stuff.

Also, how come blizzard wants to release Diablo 3 for ps3 and 4? Just feels... wrong.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: oooog on February 26, 2013, 02:08:11 AM
I was curious that this topic never made rounds around the forum.  I suppose that in itself is a testament to the opinions of the masses.

I am impressed by the potential, but I've said the same thing about almost all of the systems as of late.  The Nintendo 3DS was weak to start, but it is ever at my side these days, whereas the Vita sits collecting dust once more after conquering Persona 4.  All in all I do believe this is another case of buying the system halfway through it's lifespan.  While there is great potential, there is nobody taking advantage of what's there.

Now let's explore what actually happened with the presentation.  No price point was given, but I think we can all safely assume that $250 would be ideal, $299 is what people hope to have at least, $350 is what will probably be available for a standard issue one, and somewhere around $450 is where the actually useful bundle will be (i.e. console + controllers + game - see Wii U Bundle.)  As for the presenters, the only things that caught my interest were Watch Dogs, as it did with E3 last year, and Deep Down, rumored Dragon's Dogma 2.  Watch Dogs will more than likely be out I'm calling halfway through 2014, whereas Deep Down will more than likely be a 2015 launch, if it launches at all as is.  Perhaps it was a mere engine demonstration, who knows.

So there we have a powerful system available that Sony will inevitably botch at launch and than miraculously salvage it 2 or 3 years down it's life to become acceptable.  I love my PS3, but I only got it December of 2011, and I expect much the same delay for the PS4.  You know, unless they announce something along the lines of Shin Megami Tensei anything, Shadow of the Colossus 2 (or even the Last Guardian at this point), Kingdom Hearts 3, or a Naughty Dog reboot of Crash Bandicoot.  That's a tall order of empty promises and broken dreams though.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Meiscool on February 26, 2013, 02:49:32 AM
Looks like ****. Slightly better graphics, whoo. Change from ps2 to ps3 was far more noticeable.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on February 26, 2013, 04:09:37 AM
Graphics can only get SO much better.  Graphics have never been that important to me so yeah haha.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Felix-0 on February 26, 2013, 08:17:01 AM
More graphics =/= gaems.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: drenrin2120 on February 26, 2013, 08:58:13 AM
Looks like ****. Slightly better graphics, whoo. Change from ps2 to ps3 was far more noticeable.

This.
I'll be impressed when they can make console gaming affordable.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Prpl_Mage on February 26, 2013, 10:45:29 AM
Well it could be worth getting if they are arsed to make it backwards compatible which the PS3 wasn't in Europe.

Just feels kinda odd that Square shows their Lightning returns project for the ps3, release some new pictures of the FFX remaster and are still silently working on FFXIII VS while Sony is busting out a new console.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: fruckert on February 26, 2013, 06:07:57 PM
Nah.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on February 26, 2013, 06:14:22 PM
I've said this plenty of times before.  THEY DON'T NEED TO REMAKE FINAL FANTASY X!!!!!  MY GOD IF YOU'RE GONNA REMAKE ONE, MAKE IT... IDK.... SEVEN!?!?!?!?

I am a big fan of the Gamepad Nintendo has for the Wii U.  When I play zombie you, it makes this easy to organize and it's fun to use.  Plus aiming with it when using a sniper or something feels really well too.  But yea, give the ps4 a few years to put on some good games.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Meiscool on February 26, 2013, 08:45:05 PM
Personally, only remakes I would buy would be X or IX.

OR IF THEY REMADE FF1 AGAIN OMG THAT WOULD BE SO AWESOME.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Archem on February 26, 2013, 08:51:42 PM
ESPECIALLY IF THEY BUNDLED IT WITH FF2 GUYS.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on February 26, 2013, 09:15:24 PM
BUT THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN, ESPECIALLY NOT TWICE!
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Moosetroop11 on February 26, 2013, 11:26:25 PM
BWAAAAA

I don't care about the PS4 right now. I can only think of one console at once and I still haven't got my 3DS yet.  But in all likelihood I won't get one when it comes out. I do have a job now though, so I guess if Fianl fantasy is exclusive when the time comes or somethign ridiculous...?
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Archem on February 26, 2013, 11:37:02 PM
So far, it looks like I'll wait for a price drop. Pretty visuals, but how much of a difference will the extra power make on gameplay? The difference between the console generations has always been more than just graphics, after all. If this jump can't make a difference other than looking about as good as a high-end PC title, I'm not sure how much it will be worth. I only recently got a PS3, so I'm not too excited to make a jump to the next one yet, especially since they're abandoning backwards compatibility again.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: fruckert on February 26, 2013, 11:40:38 PM
The current generation's obsession with social networking is irking me, as well.
I mean, seriously, a dedicated "share" button on the controller?
Just...no. Not necessary. Focus on games, if I want a machine that can do all I'll buy a ****ing computer.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Prpl_Mage on February 27, 2013, 12:11:14 AM
All consoles should have a screenshot button. But anything socially related is usually crap. Can't type messages on a controller for **** anyway.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Archem on February 27, 2013, 12:48:53 AM
The Steam Big Picture text wheel is a pretty good method for text input. If that becomes a standard, I might argue that controllers can be useful for text chatting.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on February 27, 2013, 04:49:47 PM
The Wii-U implements screen shots with Miiverse so people can share with other Nintendo members or if they need help or advice.  It actually works very well.  Plus the keyboard on the Gamepad is easy to use as well.  There's also an option to draw stuff and there's a lot of people out there who are really good artists lol
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Meiscool on February 27, 2013, 05:36:20 PM
They need a button that makes a toilet pop up next to you so you can continue gaming during those important moments.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Prpl_Mage on February 27, 2013, 08:21:59 PM
There's also an option to draw stuff and there's a lot of people out there who are really good artists lol

I'm sorry but from experience this feature tends to evolve from "art" into "penises" after a short while. You go to a place and check the billboard, only penises drawn there. Or penises with smileys. Or Boobs, but mostly penises.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on February 27, 2013, 10:21:05 PM
Nobody draws that stuff and if they do, it gets deleted rather quickly.  And Meiscool, some games you can take the gamepad and play on the pooper.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 03, 2013, 10:36:07 PM
Here's an amusing video about the ps4.

http://www.screwattack.com/shows/originals/evil-craig/12-reasons-we-hate-ps4-evil-craig (http://www.screwattack.com/shows/originals/evil-craig/12-reasons-we-hate-ps4-evil-craig)
Title: Re: So...
Post by: oooog on March 03, 2013, 10:48:00 PM
They suggest Goku loses to Superman.  Their opinions are completely irrelevant from that basis alone.

I do however share about 9 of their 12 reasons for disliking the PS4 presentation.  Namely their insistence on making the thing some sort of social experience.  It's a game console.  Give me some games to play.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Archem on March 03, 2013, 10:56:05 PM
Basically.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 03, 2013, 11:54:51 PM
lol don't tell me you think Goku stood a chance against Superman. A man with limits against a man with no limits.  But we're not gonna get into to that because that will become a huge debate that will blow up the forum. Some of that stuff is for just silly humor though.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 04, 2013, 12:00:42 AM
And fyi I hate superman. He's so stupid and overpowered.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: oooog on March 04, 2013, 12:22:48 AM
There is no need for a debate, because the simple fact is that this match up cannot be calculated.  Superman is the essence of being the invincible and the ultimate, whereas Goku always surpasses the invincible and the ultimate.  Superman is only as strong as he needs to be whereas Goku surpasses his own strength as he needs to.  The only thing Superman beats Goku with is that "Superman" is apparently a valid word in the English language that does not get a squiggly red line underneath when I type it.  But Batman gets that to apparently.

May as well discuss it anyway.  The PS4 conversation appears to have died anyway, and this thread is now unoccupied.  Not that it originally had much momentum anyway.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 04, 2013, 12:58:47 AM
Well duh batman will beat them both cuz hes the goddamn batman.  The writer of superman just decided to make him do whatever the hell he wants with barely any weaknesses and such a stupid boring character.  Yeah, I said it!  I hate superman!  I dare you to comment on that death battle page and see if it sparks up a debate, but then again, it's probably still going on...
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Meiscool on March 04, 2013, 02:19:58 AM
Superman has a law degree.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 04, 2013, 02:32:51 AM
Dammit Meiscool.  Superman is a stupid idea.  Had a shot and took it...
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Meiscool on March 04, 2013, 03:44:26 AM
Well, superman is so educated that he could probably find something that goku has done illegally and have him arrested for it.
Just saiyan.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Prpl_Mage on March 04, 2013, 07:14:42 AM
Just saiyan.

Loving the pun.

So yeah, there aren't really a lot of information about the PS4 yet. And I am less interested in the console than the games that will be released for it after all. Sure, consoles can have a bunch of neat features but that doesn't make it the reason of my purchase.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Meiscool on March 04, 2013, 02:36:44 PM
Well, it became less shitty in my eyes since I have seen the FF cg thingie they have for it.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 04, 2013, 04:14:25 PM
I haven't seen that.  Is it a new FF or a remake?
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Meiscool on March 04, 2013, 05:13:04 PM
Looks new.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 04, 2013, 06:16:09 PM
feel free to link if you want.  I'll watch it haha
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Meiscool on March 04, 2013, 07:03:53 PM
E3 2012 - Final Fantasy 15 XV Trailer PS4 1080p Realtime graphics FF15 Agni's Philosophy TECH DEMO (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zks5W-XlghU#ws)
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Prpl_Mage on March 04, 2013, 08:11:51 PM
Interesting, not sure about the talibans though.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Archem on March 04, 2013, 08:12:22 PM
I hate tech demos. Nothing ever ends up looking as good as a tech demo in a realistic environment.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: oooog on March 04, 2013, 10:17:57 PM
This tech demo would have been far more impressive had it not been leaked at last years E3 (if I recall correctly.)  While the fact it is 6 months old does not reduce it's quality, the fact that I've already seen it, yet have seen no word on Versus XIII, Type-0 localization, or anything from Square that would signal something even remotely new or interesting, actually upset me.  Maybe they'll finally have enough horsepower to tackle the FFVII remake that so many people cream their pants for.  Not likely, but who knows.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: fruckert on March 04, 2013, 10:24:30 PM
Tech demos are worthless compared to game demos.
You're watching a cutscene, nothing that actually matters in a game environment.

I mean, remember the VII totally not pre-rendered demo from the PS3 unveiling?
Yeah, that was totally a showcase of the PS3s power, no?
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 05, 2013, 03:29:50 AM
I don't like fantasy games where the people look extremely realistic.  I like them with more of an artform.  FF13 had realistic cutscenes, but you could tell the characters weren't real people if that makes sense.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: fruckert on March 05, 2013, 03:35:31 AM
I don't like fantasy games where the people look extremely realistic.  I like them with more of an artform.  FF13 had realistic cutscenes, but you could tell the characters weren't real people if that makes sense.
I think FFX is a way better example.
The game very clearly had an art direction (even if it led to hair antlers) and a unique (if not very sensible) setting.
These newer games are all rehashes of some stupid dystopian sci-fi setting.

I don't like Final Fantasy.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 05, 2013, 04:09:51 AM
It's all right, I don't like Call of Duty so yeah lol.  Kids shouldn't be playing those games.  Whether or not playing them has anything to do with this, but kids these days are little bastards it seems unfortunately.  Whatever happened to respecting adults?
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Prpl_Mage on March 05, 2013, 12:41:08 PM
the fact that I've already seen it, yet have seen no word on Versus XIII, Type-0 localization, or anything from Square that would signal something even remotely new or interesting, actually upset me.  Maybe they'll finally have enough horsepower to tackle the FFVII remake that so many people cream their pants for.  Not likely, but who knows.

They said that they wouldn't remake FF7 until a new game got better ratings. They are apparently working on the other two games mentioned, but the KH crew is awfully good at not leaking information about VS.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: drenrin2120 on March 05, 2013, 01:18:03 PM
I havent liked final fantasy since IX sooo.... yeah, not too excited for XV. lol
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Meiscool on March 05, 2013, 04:19:31 PM
I just feel like there hasn't been a high quality rpg from sony in ages.
I must say though, I'm VERY happy with my wii rpgs. All 4 of them.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 05, 2013, 05:56:12 PM
I've enjoyed Xenoblade, The Last Story and Tales of Symphonia 2.  Haven't played Pandora's Tower and can't think of any others at the moment.  Which 4 were you talking about Meiscool?
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Meiscool on March 05, 2013, 07:54:35 PM
Arc Rise, Last Story, Pandora's Tower, Xenoblade.

ToS2 kinda blowed dick IMO, with the english voice actors and the monster capturing/breeding and the bs plot elements.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 05, 2013, 08:43:43 PM
I didn't mind the voice acting.  They could've done more with The Last Story though, but it was still good.  I play Dragon Quest IX on occasion, but it's just so boring a lot to me.  I love the golden series because it kinda feeds that Zelda part in me with its Psynergy puzzles and i like experimenting with classes and the weapon skills etc.  Nv heard of the Arc Rise game though. 
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Meiscool on March 05, 2013, 09:37:15 PM
Arc Rise is the best turn based rpg I've played in years. Worth looking into.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Prpl_Mage on March 05, 2013, 10:33:08 PM
Arc Rise is the best turn based rpg I've played in years. Worth looking into.

This I will do.

Yes, ToS2 just didn't live up to expectations, and it kinda sucks to have one male and one female and then 2 monster OR one of the characters from the previous game. Just a bit lame, got reminded of it while playing FFXIII2 as well. A guy, a girl and a monster. Sounds like a porno... Anyway!

Xenoblade was complete joy. First time in ages that I spend so much time playing and enjoying (not counting pokemon, you always spend like 200+ hours on those).

Last story, great game, great system, interesting world. But cut a little too short. And I kinda wanted to be a mage.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 05, 2013, 10:46:41 PM
Don't forget to pick up Fire Emblem Awakening!  But I'll also look into Arc Rise!  I like how this went from PS4 to Nintendo games...
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 05, 2013, 11:06:11 PM
Well I looked into it.  Horrible voice acting, hope those guy weren't paid much.  It looked interesting, but idk how i feel about lots of grinding.  Hmm...
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Meiscool on March 05, 2013, 11:59:25 PM
I don't recall ever grinding myself, but then again, I really enjoyed the battle system so I might've done it subconsciously.

Really though, plot and characters are its stronger points.... except for the forgettable midget girl who had attacks that created statues of herself, totally forget her name.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Prpl_Mage on March 06, 2013, 12:15:27 AM
Don't forget to pick up Fire Emblem Awakening! 

Have to wait for the middle of april for that.

Besides, voice actors usually does a great job. I just feel sorry for them because they have to say such cheesy lines sometimes. Who can forget the classic "You almost became a Jill-sandwich!" ?
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 06, 2013, 12:21:00 AM
Not in this game they don't lol

I don't think it's worth $40 though.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Archem on March 06, 2013, 12:52:03 AM
Have to wait for the middle of april for that.

Besides, voice actors usually does a great job. I just feel sorry for them because they have to say such cheesy lines sometimes. Who can forget the classic "You almost became a Jill-sandwich!" ?
To be fair, those voice actors were pretty shitty even without the cheesy dialogue.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Meiscool on March 06, 2013, 12:59:11 AM
Moar fake screams about scurry zombies please.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 06, 2013, 01:06:27 AM
Speaking of voice acting and to really take the playstation topic off course, what do you guys think about voice acting in a zelda game?  Link should never talk, but what about others?  I don't think zelda needs it at all, Skyward Sword was very well written and allowed you to imagine what the characters sounded like.  But that's just me.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Meiscool on March 06, 2013, 01:29:40 AM
I think OoT had the right track. Just a small "huh" or "yeah?" or "hyiah" or "aihfgokhhshfg" when talking to a person was enough. Kinda gave you a tone and personality.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 06, 2013, 02:34:59 AM
what about others characters besides Link?
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Archem on March 06, 2013, 03:25:36 AM
I think that there's a certain charm involved with Zelda's text-only format. The little voice cues are great, too, since they help share a character's voice without sacrificing the "silence is golden" rule. Actual voice work seems like it would detract a bit. I mean, nothing creeps me out more than Beedle's...

THANKYOU.wmv (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VL_5MX7z94#)
Title: Re: So...
Post by: fruckert on March 06, 2013, 03:44:44 AM
*shudders*
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 06, 2013, 04:34:39 AM
HAHAHAHAHA!!  Imagine him getting pissed off with voice acting in Skyward Sword.  It'd be so creepy! "You didn't buy anything!? HRAAAAAH!"
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Archem on March 06, 2013, 05:30:46 AM
That's another part of the formula. The writing can be so over the top sometimes, and by adding a voice, it could end up being pretty corny and/or annoying.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Prpl_Mage on March 06, 2013, 07:18:23 AM
Good thing about text is that you can interpret it as you please. Just like you do with a book.
Of course, I thought Rayne was a complete madman who were going to kill Lloyd in his sleep after the scene in the temple at the start. First she spanks them both and then she goes of into the ruins with a "MUUHAHAHAHAHA!!" kind of message.

Arc Rise is the best turn based rpg I've played in years. Worth looking into.

So this game never even made it to Europe apparently, typical...
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 06, 2013, 09:55:19 PM
U talking aboot tales symphonia? and yea stop being lazy and read the damn words! No wonder kids suck at english in america
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Phayre on March 07, 2013, 03:37:15 PM
I prefer games sans voices myself. Most times, even the best voice acting doesn't add much for me, but bad voice acting can seriously mess up a game.

Bad placement can, too - the aforementioned Fire Emblem Awakening decided it'd be a good idea to punctuate dialogue sequences with little mostly-unrelated voice clips. So you'll be watching a support in text and then suddenly one of the characters goes "HMMM" or "RIGHT" or "HIYAAAAAA" even if that's nothing like what the text is saying. Super annoying. I turned the voices off for that reason.

And games with bad voices that don't let you turn them off or don't have subtitles as well? The absolute worst.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Prpl_Mage on March 08, 2013, 07:09:16 AM
I prefer voices in more action-filled games like metal gear, resident evil or devil may cry or whatever. The kind of game where you are expected to be one the move all the time, staying for reading a message that appeared from your partner will kinda kill the mood.
But I did not like what they did in FFXIII2 for example where you simply walk close enough to people and they spew out some voiced typical NPC monologue, this was also done in Mass effect. I find it impossible to comprehend most of the time because of distance and ambient noise. And it forces me to stop and wait until it is all finished if I want to get it all, walk to far and it is cut off. And if I missed something I can't really hear it again unless I run far away and then come back again in hopes for the same line to play.

But adding voices to a series that haven't had any voices before gets kinda wierd. Nintendo is doing it all fine and dandy with certain sounds used from time to time, like Mario's "mamma mia" or Beedles "Hiiiyyyya!". Also in mario party where pretty much all characters got a "Oh no" line and "I gotta star!". I did prefer Samus without a voice though. Which kinda adds to my point.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 08, 2013, 05:12:21 PM
They do the walk up people talk with The Last Story too.  I don't mind the voices in Fire Emblem. I like Lon 'qu's voice because it's the actor that played Roy Mustang in Fullmetal Alchemist Brotherhood and the nonmanga.  i don't mind the battle voices either. 

There was a debate on zelda voice acting on miiverse and the dude that was complaining (Played 1 zelda game all his life which was TP) was saying how nintendo needs to stop being stupid and grow up by bringing voice acting to zelda like all of other games this modern day and age.  So I said nah, zelda can do without and he called us lil kids for not wanting them, yeah i know, he made perfect sense.  So i told him to not hate on us true fans who dont want voice acting which he clearly did and he denied ever saying it even though it was RIGHT there.  He was one of those people that expect too much and wants everything his way and doesn't appreciate anything.  I looked at his profile and he was yelling at nintendo tellin them to do things and do use this technology blah blah.  ps: his mii is ugly
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Meiscool on March 08, 2013, 08:03:53 PM
Personally, I think they need to backtrack with some game series and make more 2d games (and not the 2d but with 3d graphics crap).
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 08, 2013, 08:27:21 PM
I don't understand why people want A Link to the Past in 3D.  I can understand upgraded graphics, but 3D? No, you'll ruin the game because it's made for 2D.  Focus on new 3D. Just my opinion.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Meiscool on March 08, 2013, 10:19:17 PM
It just feels like all my favorite series have died. Super Mario 2d platformers are too gimmicky now, castlevania is focusing on this new plot that few seem to care for (even the next 2d one is based on it), and metroid... wait, what metroid.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 08, 2013, 10:47:12 PM
i loved the metroid prime trilogy.  Metroid other m wasn't bad, but it was really short.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: fruckert on March 08, 2013, 10:49:10 PM
Other M was dreadful and pretty much killed the series where it was standing.
The only good thing about it was the gameplay, linearity ignored, and the graphics. The music wasn't terrible, either.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 08, 2013, 11:12:35 PM
3D Mario will come soon. The 2D one can hold people over plus their adding luigi to it for free.  U can watch about it on the Feb 14th nintendo direct. 

I'd give metroid other m like a 7.5-8 tho. 

The two DS zeldas weren't horrible.  I mean Phantom Hourglass was my least favorite, but it was still enjoyable.  I just didn't like the touch controls that much.  As for Spirit Tracks, i really enjoyed that one.  Sure the train restricted exploration, but it was still a good game.  The dungeons were fun as well. 
But my favorite 2D zelda is still Oracle of Seasons and Ages because those were just brilliant.  Then A Link  to the Past, Minish Cap & Link's Awakening. 
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Prpl_Mage on March 18, 2013, 07:37:25 PM
I'm just curious.

How many 'round here got a Wii U, 3DS or PSP vita? None of them sold that well over here in Sweden according to latest reports.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: daoman89 on March 18, 2013, 07:51:05 PM
I have a wii U and 3ds.  wii u doesn't have many games yet so people are hating and stuff.  It's been a few months and people are already down its throat. 
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Meiscool on March 18, 2013, 08:11:42 PM
I have none. Bought the 3ds for my gf last Xmas though.
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Felix-0 on March 18, 2013, 09:02:11 PM
3ds here
Title: Re: So...
Post by: Prpl_Mage on March 21, 2013, 03:29:34 PM
Right, maybe I should point out that I have a 3DS as well.