Charas-Project

  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Calendar
  • Login
  • Register
*
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 

News:

New forum theme up and running!



  • Charas-Project »
  • Off-Topic »
  • All of all! »
  • Moderation thread.
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8

Author Topic: Moderation thread.  (Read 35139 times)

Offline SaiKar

  • KOFFING!
  • Staff
  • Royal
  • *
  • Posts: 4,082
Re: Moderation thread.
« Reply #60 on: February 15, 2009, 06:58:39 PM »
I'm really not sure who started that whole "PM someone if you have a problem" thing. Probably those sneaky mods themselves.

The only way you'll ever get a broad-scectrum change in moderator policy is by making a big fuss over it. Which can get a little ugly at times, sure, but dems the breaks. One PM from one person is easily ignored. A lot of people agreeing that something needs to be done; considerably less so.
Logged

Offline Ben

  • Some dude
  • Staff
  • Royal
  • *
  • Posts: 4,844
  • butts
    • my portfolio
Re: Moderation thread.
« Reply #61 on: February 15, 2009, 07:00:50 PM »
a/f/l? I agree


Drace just because your "tone" is calm, dosent mean you arent sanding up your vag about something or another. What they are saying, is STFU and quit whining about every policy you can find to whine about. The staff is good to you, and there are ways of addressing this sort of thin in a non confrontational manner.

Calm or not, your stance on this is purely confrontational.
Logged

Offline fruckert

  • Star-Star-Star-Star
  • Sage
  • *
  • Posts: 8,148
  • Not intended for public consumption
Re: Moderation thread.
« Reply #62 on: February 15, 2009, 07:02:07 PM »
Agreeing with Gem
And has no other thing to contribute to the conversation, so I'll STFU
Logged
Quote
Ellie: I had a slice of ham in my hand. I was going to drop it, so I slapped it hard. It attached itself to the wall

Offline Drace

  • Sage
  • *
  • Posts: 5,199
Re: Moderation thread.
« Reply #63 on: February 15, 2009, 07:03:22 PM »
Quote from: gemini on February 15, 2009, 07:00:50 PM
a/f/l? I agree


Drace just because your "tone" is calm, dosent mean you arent sanding up your vag about something or another. What they are saying, is STFU and quit whining about every policy you can find to whine about. The staff is good to you, and there are ways of addressing this sort of thin in a non confrontational manner.

Calm or not, your stance on this is purely confrontational.

Confrontational, yes. But that was the main goal. Read Saikar's post, 'nough said.
Logged


Offline Ben

  • Some dude
  • Staff
  • Royal
  • *
  • Posts: 4,844
  • butts
    • my portfolio
Re: Moderation thread.
« Reply #64 on: February 15, 2009, 07:11:22 PM »
Re-read every post youve made in the last week.
Logged

Offline SaiKar

  • KOFFING!
  • Staff
  • Royal
  • *
  • Posts: 4,082
Re: Moderation thread.
« Reply #65 on: February 15, 2009, 07:26:27 PM »
Well Drace, I think your problem is that not enough people are agreeing with you. Big fussy thread or not, one person is still only one.
Logged

Offline Ben

  • Some dude
  • Staff
  • Royal
  • *
  • Posts: 4,844
  • butts
    • my portfolio
Re: Moderation thread.
« Reply #66 on: February 15, 2009, 07:36:12 PM »
 Yep. that pretty much sums it up. Any personal dislike toward drace aside, hes pretty much butthurt....Methinks he wanted everyone to say
"O YA UR TTLY RIGHT. YOU SHOULD BE A MOD DRACE"


But then again, hes not reading this, because apparently charas has an ignore function with an inconsitient reply function, and Drace can no longer view anything I type. Im fine with this....Imaginary ignore or not.


Personally, I dont think anything is wrong with the current moderation. I think aside from the bots, and the general sense of pre-pubescent ADHD/offtopicism-that-has-to-be-kicked-in-the-***-from-time-to-time everything is going well.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2009, 07:42:21 PM by gemini »
Logged

Offline Drace

  • Sage
  • *
  • Posts: 5,199
Re: Moderation thread.
« Reply #67 on: February 15, 2009, 08:07:46 PM »
Quote from: SaiKar on February 15, 2009, 07:26:27 PM
Well Drace, I think your problem is that not enough people are agreeing with you. Big fussy thread or not, one person is still only one.

*points at Grandy*

I don't care if a lot of people agree with me, really. I just don't want died-out topics to be locked when we're having fun. That's all I want.
Logged


Offline Cosmos

  • Quite the bemused
  • Staff
  • Leader
  • *
  • Posts: 2,326
Re: Moderation thread.
« Reply #68 on: February 15, 2009, 11:51:02 PM »
Drace, no need to apologize since I agree with you.

Charas is fuckin bipolar.

Note: Me & Sai only visit to watch Charas bitchfits =D
Logged
Go. ****. Yourself. <3

Offline A Forgotten Legend

  • Your neighborhood box of colors
  • Royal
  • *
  • Posts: 4,428
    • Website
Re: Moderation thread.
« Reply #69 on: February 16, 2009, 03:57:59 AM »
Quote from: Midnight on February 15, 2009, 11:51:02 PM
Note: Me & Sai only visit to watch Charas bitchfits =D

...

I love how bitch isn't censored.  How odd is that?
Logged

Offline Ben

  • Some dude
  • Staff
  • Royal
  • *
  • Posts: 4,844
  • butts
    • my portfolio
Re: Moderation thread.
« Reply #70 on: February 16, 2009, 10:01:08 AM »
****** is though. and i think niggerdicks and niggertits is as well. However, many other racial slurs are not filtered. Kike, Honky, Heeb, Spic ,cracker,Jap and paki.

Note: I use these words in a completely regretful manner, and I use them strictly for the sake of example. I am hoping to help discover new words that need to be addressed in the charas word filter.

Other words, that are significantly less offensive, but would keep things fun, that i also think should be censored are as follows.

Gran
Naruto
the
sprites
the letter E
various memeber names, my own included.
Bukakke
Unmod
boneriffic
Batman



If anyone else knows of any words that are not filtered
that should be filtered, Id love to hear Ideas. It will make charas a more effective communiy.
Logged

Offline Drace

  • Sage
  • *
  • Posts: 5,199
Re: Moderation thread.
« Reply #71 on: February 16, 2009, 11:15:31 AM »
Quote from: A Forgotten Legend on February 16, 2009, 03:57:59 AM
...

I love how bitch isn't censored.  How odd is that?

There is a weird selective censorship here. For all I know, only the F-word is cencored.
Logged


Offline fruckert

  • Star-Star-Star-Star
  • Sage
  • *
  • Posts: 8,148
  • Not intended for public consumption
Re: Moderation thread.
« Reply #72 on: February 16, 2009, 07:25:57 PM »
*** bitch **** and **** are censores

We have a bad censor, methinks
Logged
Quote
Ellie: I had a slice of ham in my hand. I was going to drop it, so I slapped it hard. It attached itself to the wall

Offline Razor

  • Staff
  • Sage
  • *
  • Posts: 6,247
  • 2 cool 4 skin
Re: Moderation thread.
« Reply #73 on: February 16, 2009, 09:24:09 PM »
Quote from: gemini on February 16, 2009, 10:01:08 AM
Other words, that are significantly less offensive, but would keep things fun, that i also think should be censored are as follows.

Gran
I see what you did there.


Yeah you guys complain about bitch being uncensored but the VERY NEXT DAY AFTER I PUT THAT FILTER ON someone's going to make a "my Labrador ***** hasn't been very active lately help" and then "hey omg why is ***** censored it's a perfectly usable word"
I can predict this because Red recently got a job involving dog husbandry.
Logged
Always right.

Offline Bluhman

  • Global Moderator
  • Royal
  • *
  • Posts: 4,977
Re: Moderation thread.
« Reply #74 on: February 16, 2009, 09:36:18 PM »
Uh oh, we're discussing the word filter now. Quick, lock the topic.
Logged

  • Print
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8
« previous next »
  • Charas-Project »
  • Off-Topic »
  • All of all! »
  • Moderation thread.
 

  • SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
  • XHTML
  • 2O11
  • RSS
  • WAP2
  • Simple Machines Forum