Scientists have suceeded in turning gay rams straight

[Trevlac]

In fact, he said the opposite. You have the observation skills of a cheese sandwich.

[Dragonium]

Hmm, it seems Trev pwned an idiot. Again.

If people want to be gay, let them. They'll have to put up with people calling them faggots anyway.

"As well, a man shall not share a bed with an animal lest he also face damnation"

*Adds to list of reasons why Alabama is Hell*

EDIT: Lawl, same time post.

[Darrellito]

Originally posted by Blue_Strife
I never said I live my life by texts. O_o

I didn't mean it that way. Too many people are living their lives by the bible though. I only quoted you cause you said you don't follow the good book.

[Drace]

Why hate gay people? Hell, more chicks for you ; )

EDIT:

Also, can't religious people believe in that evolution is part of God's almighty plan?

[Darkfox]

There are those who do. But I don't really care for it. Science can poke out theories but they don't offer actual answers. They show how it works, or how it might have worked, but can only argue about why. In this case to really know they'd have to been there, in which case they'd have to be a long living immortal. Are they? I don't think so. But just in case I'm getting my Highlander sword and just in case one of them are I'll get a piece of it.

[Drace]

Originally posted by Darkfox
There are those who do. But I don't really care for it. Science can poke out theories but they don't offer actual answers. They show how it works, or how it might have worked, but can only argue about why. In this case to really know they'd have to been there, in which case they'd have to be a long living immortal. Are they? I don't think so. But just in case I'm getting my Highlander sword and just in case one of them are I'll get a piece of it.

And religion has actual answers and proof? No, they don't.

[Kinslayer]

Scientist: "Okay... on one hand we can use this millions in order to find true solutions to health issues. On the other hand we waste it in order to 'heal' homosexuality. I'll see what to do after I hit myself with this hammer a thousand times."



Seriously, why don't those friggin' scientists do some research in things that really matter?!!!!!!!!!

There's nothing wrong with homosexuality, it's a choice, not a sickness that has to be healed.

[Dragonium]

Originally posted by Kinslayer
Scientist: "Okay... on one hand we can use this millions in order to find true solutions to health issues. On the other hand we waste it in order to 'heal' homosexuality. I'll see what to do after I hit myself with this hammer a thousand times."

Seriously, why don't those friggin' scientists do some research in things that really matter?!!!!!!!!!

There's nothing wrong with homosexuality, it's a choice, not a sickness that has to be healed.

+1.

"We have good news and bad news. The bad news is that we haven't found a cure for cancer, so many people are going to die. The good news is we spent all our money on developing a cure for homosexuality, which isn't a disease or need to be treated!"

[Blue_Strife]

Ahh. Agreeing with me is fine then.

Too many people blindly follow the bible, and don't even question it period. It's quite sad, really. I'm a little creeped out by the people who aren't at LEAST a slight bit skeptic about following it to a T. I look at God like a kid with an antfarm (If there is a God), carrying out his will or not is pointless. If he's there, he obviously doesn't care.

Right now though, neither Science nor Religion can prove that they're right (at least to the best of my knowledge). They can easily SAY they're right, but like Darkfox said, they'd have to have been there; the bible can't really count (in my opinion), because who's to say the pen didn't change hands, and if not that, who said they weren't being influenced?

It's like one giant over opinionated life long debate. >_>

EDIT:: On topic, I say if people want to be gay, let them be gay. It's their choice--no need to be complete elitists about it, nor treat it like it's some kind of disease, which it isn't. -_-

[X_marks_the_ed]

Why don't scientists spend their time solving the mysteries of life instead of "curing" gayness? Like the mystery of where the bread goes after you put it in the toaster and toast comes out.

[drenrin2120]

Here's my opinion:

The bible was made (more or less put together) more than 2 thousand years ago. It may have BEEN god's word, but with so much time gone by, so many events, so many variables in this equation. Old and New Testaments, translation issues, bias opinions, and downright dirty dealing, I choose to personally not rely on the bible. I accept it's possible that there's a god, but I also accept it's not. I say, we'll find out when we die, so I'll jsut go through with my life doing the best I can and wait till I die to find out what happens.

[Darrellito]

Originally posted by Darkfox
There are those who do. But I don't really care for it. Science can poke out theories but they don't offer actual answers. They show how it works, or how it might have worked, but can only argue about why. In this case to really know they'd have to been there, in which case they'd have to be a long living immortal. Are they? I don't think so. But just in case I'm getting my Highlander sword and just in case one of them are I'll get a piece of it.

There can be only one...

[Daetyrnis]

1. I've counted already three people, just by skimming the topic, referring to sexuality as a preference, a choice.  It is not, otherwise people could just change their sexuality at will; which they can't.  The issue that started this topic even discredits that, as it is about the discovery of something that predetermines the animal's sexuality.  That means our sexuality is hard-coded into everyone of us, and isn't chosen.

2. If you're against homosexuals, just stop.  It doesn't affect you, so why bother.  It is natural, otherwise homosexuality would not be present in animals other than humans.  Why should you care so much about what someone else does in bed?  It doesn't affect you.

3. If you're quoting and trying to use the Bible as proof, you could just as well quote Harry Potter or The Cat in the Hat.  The only differences are that the Bible is obviously of a different type of fiction (religious), and the Bible is apparently the oldest book.  First, age doesn't equate into reliability, end of story.  Second, the Bible has been edited countless times over the centuries, and has been translated into the language you are quoting: English.  The version you read is not the word of God.  It is a censored text that has been translated (which will always distort meaning) and changed to suit a few powerful people's liking.

4. The Christian God be neither proven nor disproven.  He is said to be beyond our contemplation (scientifically speaking, God may be purely a higher-dimensional being, see String Theory).  Any religious idol or deity is followed by faith, not by evidence or proof.

[Darrellito]

Well said.

[elementalhero76]

I agree with one and four. About 3 why then we use only the bible to srown in people i.e. the courts? Why not use the jewish torrah (old testament first five books) or the koran?