Charas-Project

  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Calendar
  • Login
  • Register
*
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 

News:

Click here to join us on IRC (#charas on irc.freenode.net)!



  • Charas-Project »
  • Off-Topic »
  • All of all! »
  • Steampunk to broad?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Steampunk to broad?  (Read 7927 times)

Offline supasora

  • A true mexican hero.
  • Acolyte
  • *
  • Posts: 398
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #15 on: August 24, 2009, 08:08:12 PM »
Quote from: fruckert on August 24, 2009, 08:04:58 PM
Archem is the one who hit it closest to home.
And if you want to see one of the best Steampunk definitions out there, go find a copy of Arcanum: of Steamworks and Magick Obscura.
Best Steampunk game out there, IMPO.
...
Despite there being very scant few games that can qualify as Steampunk.
they need more steampunk games.
Logged
The hero of Canton, The man they call Jayne...

Offline fruckert

  • Star-Star-Star-Star
  • Sage
  • *
  • Posts: 8,148
  • Not intended for public consumption
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #16 on: August 24, 2009, 08:08:44 PM »
Indubitafiably justificied.
Logged
Quote
Ellie: I had a slice of ham in my hand. I was going to drop it, so I slapped it hard. It attached itself to the wall

Offline Angel Walter

  • Better Spriter Than They Were Before
  • Acolyte
  • *
  • Posts: 380
  • Truthseeker or Victim of Applied Metaphysics?
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #17 on: August 24, 2009, 08:12:17 PM »
Quote from: supasora on August 24, 2009, 08:08:12 PM
they need more steampunk games.
There's a PS2 game called "Steambot Chronicles" that's pretty steampunk.

Also, I agree on the aisrship front. The way I see it, Steampunk can be set from the beginning of steam-power forward (you can get around that by changing when steam became the main power source). But it needs to have more than just an airship or two. Another common feature is imagining the possibility if discarded scientific theories from the period were true.
« Last Edit: August 24, 2009, 08:21:06 PM by Angel Walter »
Logged
Action figures by Fisherson! What a fine fellow he is!

Offline fruckert

  • Star-Star-Star-Star
  • Sage
  • *
  • Posts: 8,148
  • Not intended for public consumption
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #18 on: August 24, 2009, 08:36:05 PM »
Spontaneous life?
Hmm...
*notes to try to insert that into Myrdia*
Logged
Quote
Ellie: I had a slice of ham in my hand. I was going to drop it, so I slapped it hard. It attached itself to the wall

Offline supasora

  • A true mexican hero.
  • Acolyte
  • *
  • Posts: 398
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #19 on: August 24, 2009, 08:52:22 PM »
Yeah. I guess steampunk is becoming trendy though and people are trying to jack up the meaning. Mad Max is apparently steampunk because a bunch of alternative people were problably like "Wow I like the style of this movie, we should call it deisel punk and make that a part of a sub genre of steampunk!" I liked it better when it was about steam in a victorian setting. Mad Max is not steampunk...
Logged
The hero of Canton, The man they call Jayne...

Offline Archem

  • One, one too many schizophrenic tendancies
  • Global Moderator
  • Over 9000!
  • *
  • Posts: 15,013
  • I made a fortune in toothpicks, but I lost it all in a fire.
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #20 on: August 24, 2009, 08:59:34 PM »
That's ****ing post-nuclear. Gawd.
Logged

Offline supasora

  • A true mexican hero.
  • Acolyte
  • *
  • Posts: 398
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #21 on: August 24, 2009, 09:06:34 PM »
just google "steampunk mad max" and one of the first results is an article where a chick thinks she's steampunk 'cause she dresses like mad max. I'd put a link but Im lazy.
Logged
The hero of Canton, The man they call Jayne...

Offline Angel Walter

  • Better Spriter Than They Were Before
  • Acolyte
  • *
  • Posts: 380
  • Truthseeker or Victim of Applied Metaphysics?
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #22 on: August 24, 2009, 09:26:55 PM »
Quote from: supasora on August 24, 2009, 09:06:34 PM
just google "steampunk mad max" and one of the first results is an article where a chick thinks she's steampunk 'cause she dresses like mad max.
1. I'll check it out!
2. How does dressing as someone from a post-apocalyptic civilisation in which steam does not feature make you STEAM-punk? AGH! I feel sick just thinking about it. We need to DO something about this!
Logged
Action figures by Fisherson! What a fine fellow he is!

Offline supasora

  • A true mexican hero.
  • Acolyte
  • *
  • Posts: 398
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #23 on: August 24, 2009, 09:33:30 PM »
Quote from: Angel Walter on August 24, 2009, 09:26:55 PM
1. I'll check it out!
2. How does dressing as someone from a post-apocalyptic civilisation in which steam does not feature make you STEAM-punk? AGH! I feel sick just thinking about it. We need to DO something about this!
From a "steampunk" persons perspective... "Well... they dress cool..."
Logged
The hero of Canton, The man they call Jayne...

Offline Darkfox

  • These spectacles do nothing
  • Staff
  • Over 9000!
  • *
  • Posts: 10,215
    • Chaos Realm - Home of the God Beasts
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #24 on: August 24, 2009, 11:56:57 PM »
Overall, steampunk is in the technology. Not just in the way of dressing. The definition is not so rigid, but Mad Max isn't steampunk.
Logged



Offline fruckert

  • Star-Star-Star-Star
  • Sage
  • *
  • Posts: 8,148
  • Not intended for public consumption
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #25 on: August 25, 2009, 12:09:57 AM »
Plus, MAD-MAX IS POST-APOC, WHICH IS VERY FAR FROM STEAMPUNK.
*coughs*
Sorry, I'm allergic to stupid, it irritates my throat.
Logged
Quote
Ellie: I had a slice of ham in my hand. I was going to drop it, so I slapped it hard. It attached itself to the wall

Offline Archem

  • One, one too many schizophrenic tendancies
  • Global Moderator
  • Over 9000!
  • *
  • Posts: 15,013
  • I made a fortune in toothpicks, but I lost it all in a fire.
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #26 on: August 25, 2009, 12:49:31 AM »
Quote from: Darkfox on August 24, 2009, 11:56:57 PM
Overall, steampunk is in the technology. Not just in the way of dressing. The definition is not so rigid, but Mad Max isn't steampunk.
I'm sue the time period is important, since many other time periods have alternative fuel sources that replace steam. For example, we use electricity for everything.
Logged

Offline fruckert

  • Star-Star-Star-Star
  • Sage
  • *
  • Posts: 8,148
  • Not intended for public consumption
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #27 on: August 25, 2009, 12:57:08 AM »
Electricity was available during Victorian times =P
They just didn't use it for as much stuff as we do now, because the technology wasn't there yet, because it was freshly discovered for the uses at the time.
Logged
Quote
Ellie: I had a slice of ham in my hand. I was going to drop it, so I slapped it hard. It attached itself to the wall

Offline Archem

  • One, one too many schizophrenic tendancies
  • Global Moderator
  • Over 9000!
  • *
  • Posts: 15,013
  • I made a fortune in toothpicks, but I lost it all in a fire.
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #28 on: August 25, 2009, 01:34:53 AM »
Exactly my point. It wasn't as refined/readily available as it is today, so alternate fuel and power sources were used.

And to break a possible attempt at contradiction: We use many fuels to create electricity, which is what we use. Kind of like how we use fossil fuels to create gasoline for our vehicles: Nobody puts unrefined oil to make their cars go. **** doesn't work.
Logged

  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »
  • Charas-Project »
  • Off-Topic »
  • All of all! »
  • Steampunk to broad?
 

  • SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
  • XHTML
  • 2O11
  • RSS
  • WAP2
  • Simple Machines Forum