Pearl Harbor

[dragoninja]

Ace: you said you... thanked? anyway, thanked the veterans for saving the US using Pearl Harbour... They got blown up, besides they weren't really "veterans" they were new the whole bunch. It's impossible that they could've been veterans as this was probably their first and only war experience.

World Wars wouldn't be World wars if the whole World hadn't got involved.

Bush is making up for Europes "head start" in starting WW, he's only inches away from starting a 3rd, and I think he's happy with his accomplishments(sp?).

War is bad, should be left behind, rememberance days only brings sorrow and reasons to start a new one... Japan PWNED Pearl harbour and that's about it.

"Make luv not war" I think that's what they say.

[Meiscool-2]

We're blaming Repubilican's for the CURRENT slide in America's economy, not for the war or any past problems Ace.

And, War is not bad. Sometimes, it's an only resort. Meaningless wars (Like the Cold War AKA oil war and this current Iraq War) are what you would call pointless. Just like guns don't kill people do, people kill people, war isn't bad, but killing is.

[Black Massacre]

Bush is trying to start a new world war with the crap he is pulling on Cuba and ****.

[dragoninja]

Originally posted by Meiscool
War is not bad. Just like guns don't kill, people do, people kill people, war isn't bad.

You said WHAT!? How in the flying F*** can war in any case be good!? People die because some stupids f***ed up people get's owned by another contry through verbal assault of something and they want revenge whilst hiding behind an armada heading towards the enemy contry... how can you even MENTION that war isn't bad, and this whole "guns don't kill, people do" crap? GUNS DO KILL!!! IT'S THEIR MAIN PURPOSE!!! the bullet don't kill intentionally, it's the gun that fires it, the gun can fire by itself it it gets a sudden bash.

People who uses guns uses them for protection or "respect" (which they SEROUSLY have misstranslated) it's simple actually the cycle:
Finger triggers it, Gun loads off a bullet, bullet hits something eventually.
See, the bullet have no choice but to hit as they can't stop doing anything but going forward!

War is bad, it's never appropriate, everything can be handled civilised. I wish people would understand this.

[Kinslayer]

There are some IDIOTS in Argentina that celebrate Halloween... it's got nothing to do with our culture, but morons are everywhere...

[Cerebus]

Originally posted by Black Massacre
Bush is trying to start a new world world with the crap he is pulling on Cuba and ****.

A new world world? Don't you mean a new world war?

[Meiscool-2]

Originally posted by dragoninja

quote:

Originally posted by Meiscool War is not bad. Just like guns don't kill, people do, people kill people, war isn't bad.

You said WHAT!? How in the flying F*** can war in any case be good!? People die because some stupids f***ed up people get's owned by another contry through verbal assault of something and they want revenge whilst hiding behind an armada heading towards the enemy contry... how can you even MENTION that war isn't bad, and this whole "guns don't kill, people do" crap? GUNS DO KILL!!! IT'S THEIR MAIN PURPOSE!!! the bullet don't kill intentionally, it's the gun that fires it, the gun can fire by itself it it gets a sudden bash.

People who uses guns uses them for protection or "respect" (which they SEROUSLY have misstranslated) it's simple actually the cycle:
Finger triggers it, Gun loads off a bullet, bullet hits something eventually.
See, the bullet have no choice but to hit as they can't stop doing anything but going forward!

War is bad, it's never appropriate, everything can be handled civilised. I wish people would understand this.

War isn't good or bad, but it's necessary.

And, the PERSON fires the gun, dur. The gun doesn't cause the bullet to fly, the PERSON does, double dur.

Again, war is part of life. America wouldn't exist if it wern't for it. I'll say I don't like killing and etc, but it's something that must happen to deside factors of what will happen. Talking does ****, force is what does things.

[Razor]

But you can't launch a bullet with out a gun.

YOU FAIL.



Anyway, War is an ironic thing, without WW2, we wouldn't have most of the technology we have today.

[Meiscool-2]

Originally posted by Razor
But you can't launch a bullet with out a gun.

YOU FAIL.B]

Throw the bullet.

YOU FAIL

Put it in a long tube and light the end on fire, like a potato laucher. That's not a GUN

YOU FAIL

Attact the bullet to a stick and fire it with a bow

YOU FAIL

As you see, all projectile-murders are caused by humans putting sharp impaling objects in something that can propel them, be it a hand or a gun. And, don't use the "well then the gun is still what kills you" sad and pointless debate, because I could counter that with "The hand throws the knife, does the hand then kill you and not the person as well?" or, "nope, the fire propels the bullet, so it's not the gun that kills you, but the effect of the person pulling the trigger and making the hammer cause an explosion. Please guys, try to make a decent arguement for me if you're going to even try to argue here.

[Razor]

Ok, you have no idea how retarded your concept of throwing a bullet to kill is.
Out of a very high window, yes, but horizontally, it's like throwing a rock.

And I doubt it's the bullet doing the killing when it's on an arrow.
"Oh look, I'm gonna glue this bullet onto a bowling ball, then launch it out of a cannon, and when it hits that guy on the head, it will be the bullet which does the killing! I'm a freakin' genius!"

Originally posted by Meiscool
Put it in a long tube and light the end on fire, like a potato laucher. That's not a GUN

Wikipedia
A gun is a mechanical device that fires projectiles at high velocity, using a propellant such as gun powder or compressed air.

Holy crap! You know what this means?
YOU FAIL!
Good challenge though. Had me beat for a minute there.

[Shady Ultima]

War isn't good, but I agree it is often necessary. Think, if we never had wars, the Roman empire would have never risen, never fallen, we'd still be in a primitive state of life. There would have been no WWI which led it WWII, and without WWII, we wouldn't have any of the technologies that arose from the necessity.

[Meiscool-2]

Originally posted by Razor
Ok, you have no idea how retarded your concept of throwing a bullet to kill is.
Out of a very high window, yes, but horizontally, it's like throwing a rock.

And I doubt it's the bullet doing the killing when it's on an arrow.
"Oh look, I'm gonna glue this bullet onto a bowling ball, then launch it out of a cannon, and when it hits that guy on the head, it will be the bullet which does the killing! I'm a freakin' genius!"

quote:

Originally posted by Meiscool Put it in a long tube and light the end on fire, like a potato laucher. That's not a GUN

quote:

Wikipedia A gun is a mechanical device that fires projectiles at high velocity, using a propellant such as gun powder or compressed air.

.

The def can also define a hunting bow, those baseball/tenis ball shooters, pryovents, etc. Come up with something better will ya?

Plus, you said it right there. "I put a bowling ball..." "I launch it...." Oh wow, and you say I contradict.

YOU FAIL

[Razor]

Well, if you were more careful when throwing around the term gun, we wouldn't be here.

[Meiscool-2]

I was using gun as a common item that almost everyone knows what it is. The point is, that no matter the murder weapon, the cause of that weapon doing damage can boil down to someone putting it in a place that can preform harm.

Edit- Plus, the retarded concept of throwing a bullet ins't meaning it should kill someone, you said 'launch'. And, again, you contradict yourself when saying that I shouldn't thrown around the word gun.

[Razor]

How do I contradict myself when you're the one saying gun, and I'm the one pointing out its definition?