Click here to join us on IRC (#charas on irc.freenode.net)!
Originally posted by DragoniumQuoteOriginally posted by KinslayerGuns 'r good to keep the King of England out of our lands!Is that what you want?!The King of England...?!You know, you'd be surprised how many people today actually whole-heartedly believe that there is still a King of England.[/B]
Originally posted by KinslayerGuns 'r good to keep the King of England out of our lands!Is that what you want?!The King of England...?!
Originally posted by DragoniumAnyone can shoot someone. Swords are better, since they're about skill. If everyone had swords instead of guns, we'd be a lot safer. And wars would be more fun. The only reason people prefer guns is because of convenience. A sword requires effort to swing. Not so with a gun.Guns are the result of mankind's laziness.QuoteOriginally posted by KinslayerGuns 'r good to keep the King of England out of our lands!Is that what you want?!The King of England...?!You know, you'd be surprised how many people today actually whole-heartedly believe that there is still a King of England.[/B]
Originally posted by drenrin2120Dying by the blade of a sword is, I'd imagine, way more brutal and just out-right disturbing then a gun shot to the head. And half the time you didn't die instantly, you'd be ripped open at the stomach or mortally wounded elsewhere, unable to move on the ground, then trampled on by both foe and allie. If you were lucky, maybe you'd get stabbed through the head, heart or major artery. Yeah, guns are definitely more efficient, but I do believe it's also in part to humans being 'lazy'.
Originally posted by ZeroKirbyXQuoteOriginally posted by drenrin2120Dying by the blade of a sword is, I'd imagine, way more brutal and just out-right disturbing then a gun shot to the head. And half the time you didn't die instantly, you'd be ripped open at the stomach or mortally wounded elsewhere, unable to move on the ground, then trampled on by both foe and allie. If you were lucky, maybe you'd get stabbed through the head, heart or major artery. Yeah, guns are definitely more efficient, but I do believe it's also in part to humans being 'lazy'. Yep. Especially when they had armor, any attack wouldn't ever kill you, just **** you up so you could either drown in the mud or be crushed under corpses.[/B]
yeah, its easy to sit and cut apart guns and theoir effects, but the truth is, If guns never came along...the world would be alot more of a violent place. Police get sweet guns. They keep people from coming into your house and taking your stuff and Raping your daughter
Originally posted by drenrin2120QuoteOriginally posted by ZeroKirbyXQuoteOriginally posted by drenrin2120Dying by the blade of a sword is, I'd imagine, way more brutal and just out-right disturbing then a gun shot to the head. And half the time you didn't die instantly, you'd be ripped open at the stomach or mortally wounded elsewhere, unable to move on the ground, then trampled on by both foe and allie. If you were lucky, maybe you'd get stabbed through the head, heart or major artery. Yeah, guns are definitely more efficient, but I do believe it's also in part to humans being 'lazy'. Yep. Especially when they had armor, any attack wouldn't ever kill you, just **** you up so you could either drown in the mud or be crushed under corpses.[/B]*Infomercial acting voice*Wow, drag was right! Sounds like one gosh darn good time![/B]
