Charas: The Gathering

[Cerebus]

That's the idea. It has some flaws, like you just pointed, but hey.

Ah, ok. Well that's still very good, it's not like other card games didn't have any flaws. And well, it's actually not really a flaw, since there are ways to destroy Walls (high Def cards). Just have to be lucky to draw the good card(s).

[Dragonium]

It had to be done.

I expect there to be Wall of Text (Boosts DEF) and tl;dr (Destroys WoT) as generic spellcards. Someone needs to make some good art for them.

I'll do Dragonium's stuff when I'm not a lazy twat.

EDIT: Also we should lay down font sizes and formatting rules and such. Everyone's cards are slightly different and it looks strange.

EDIT2: Changed the picture to make it more relevant.

[Felix-0]

New card from felix:

[Meiscool-2]

BMP images are the worst... I think that was a horrible idea for a card to be honest.

As for  formatting, I think we should have just one/two people do it. Someone makes up the text, image, quote, background, etc, and then one/two people who we name as the "official card maker" would compile it into a card. This is just an idea for similarity's sake, of course.

[Cerebus]

Well, here are some cards I made. Just tell me if there's anything wrong with them.
I also made an attempt for a "rarity system" which also somehow indicate the strength of the card (of course, common cards won't be as strong as rare cards) since all Card Games has one. It's quite simple, it's actually the same as magic (black=common, silver= uncommon, gold=rare). Feel free to edit or simply remove it if you like/don't like it.



Also, since I'm not sure about the rules, if you're actually supposed to block only once per turn, then the Wandering Wall would be "...once per 2 turn". Oh, and Kolomyth can also be used on opponent's cards, but I'm not sure if it should be mentioned in the card.

[Felix-0]

That card makes no sense man.

as I recall theres/ members / Mods/ Admin...
That card can only be used on a Member not mod or Admin...but
it allows the card to attack twice, when this effect is used, the Equipment is destroyed, and the Warrior/ Member has no DEF the next turn..and it was made as a joke card 

*exemplar*

[Meiscool-2]

Xciertszevn might be a little overpowered.

[Cerebus]

Uhm, I thought it might be. I guess I should either shorten its duration, or have it increases Atk and Def by 2. Or both. What do you think?

[Meiscool-2]

Meh, you could make it be something like it increases the str/def by 3 for two turns, then kills the unit at the end of those two turns.

I dunno. Your card haha

[Moosetroop11]

Meis's sounds more fair. Sacrificing a card is no problem if you can wipe out everything for a couple of turns.

[Cerebus]

**** MIC, you beat me to posting. And said the exact same thing.

But you posted 2 minutes after him! Took you 2 minutes for that post!? But anyway...

The thing is, it's supposed to be an improvement of Kolomyth, so killing the target wouldn't really work, hehe.
Maybe the same stats, but no berserk, since its real improvement is that it allows anyone modified by it to retain his kind and such. But it wouldn't be very good, since there will probably have some equipment with about the same stats, but that will last until the Warrior card is destroyed, instead of 3 turns. I'll wait and see for more cards to come and I'll try to balance it.

Also, that "rarity system" I made could also represent how much of that card are allowed in one deck, like, let's say:
Gold=1, Silver=2 and Black=3. Or maybe more, but I think 3 would be enough. So, if there's a card that seems quite strong, at least it would be limited.

Oh and last thing, there could be some categories or I don't know how to call it... like beast, robot, human, etc. so there will be some items/equip that can't be given to that card. For exemple, both chemicals shouldn't be used on Wandering Wall, since it's a robot. But that's quite optional. Again, I guess it would be better to wait for more cards to come, to see if this could be used. Like, if there's only 2 beasts, 3 robots and the rest are human, it's quite pointless.

[Meiscool-2]

We have enough Beast people here. Razor, Moose, Osmose, Cerebus, Drace, etc. I think it is a good idea to try and make some classes.

[Fisherson]

Dragon, Mutant, Spirit, Human, Fiend, Angel. Those are the only ones I can think up off the top of my head.
I know it's not realy pratical, but , shouldn't we also have elements? Like Fire, wind , Water , Ice , Earth, Light , Dark. Just a thought. Also where would we put Type any why? I don't think theres any card space left.

[Grandy]

But you posted 2 minutes after him! Took you 2 minutes for that post!?

AND his post doesn't show the "Edited" message.
 


 Also, for the classes thing, I'd be cool, but I'm afraid if we start to make rules more complicated this game will never be finished. We should call this Charas Card v1.0 or something.

[Djanki]

Let's ignore classes for now, I say--we should instead worry about how the game works, and such. Game rules, that's what we need.