A few things I dont liek about charas

[Robotam]

Originally posted by smokey_locs2002

quote:

Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki that was the biggest piece of spam i've seen in years shadus..

He's the reason I really started this topic.. He made a topic advertising I told him about no being able to do it and then 10 seconds later the topic was gone.

Topic is in junk bin. I moved it there because it was the right thing to do. Now if I something dissapears you'll find it in the junk bin, keep that in mind.

[smokey_locs2002]

Originally posted by Robotam

quote:

Originally posted by smokey_locs2002 quote: Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki that was the biggest piece of spam i've seen in years shadus.. He's the reason I really started this topic.. He made a topic advertising I told him about no being able to do it and then 10 seconds later the topic was gone.

Topic is in junk bin. I moved it there because it was the right thing to do. Now if I something dissapears you'll find it in the junk bin, keep that in mind.

oh... okay I see it.
lol Still though!!

*keeps ranting*

[MrMister]

Okay. Should use html, not this ridiculous SF Code. Tags have to be capitalized? What the hell is that?

[X_marks_the_ed]

Charas has always been perfect in my eyes, but there's just one problem I have with it.

The rules state that lvl 3 offensive images are prohibited. (No pornographic images)

Yet, I've noticed that many users have avatars that are just barely below pornography are not being taken care of. We have female members, and i'm sure they'd be really offended by such images.

As an example, http://charas-project.net/forum/viewmember.php?userid=20434

I have no problem with the user, just the signature.

It's just barely below pornography.

[MrMister]

Originally posted by X_marks_the_ed
Charas has always been perfect in my eyes, but there's just one problem I have with it.

The rules state that lvl 3 offensive images are prohibited. (No pornographic images)

Yet, I've noticed that many users have avatars that are just barely below pornography are not being taken care of. We have female members, and i'm sure they'd be really offended by such images.

As an example, http://charas-project.net/forum/viewmember.php?userid=20434
" target="_blank">http://charas-project.net/forum/viewmember.php?userid=20434

I have no problem with the user, just the signature.

It's just barely below pornography.

The fact that it is below pornography means there is nothing to deal with. Lots of things are offensive to some people and funny to others. For example, I once laughed at a kid who stepped on a bee at the park. The mother was offended and gave me the finger, but she has to coexist with me, because I go to the park too.

That picture might be filthy and immoral, but filth is the spice of life.
Just ignore it. Ignore it ignore it ignore it, Hilary Clinton. Look away. How can a drawing be offensive to anyone? Don't create problems like you're some bitchy 30-something mother who caught her son playing Grand Theft Auto. Any female members can choose to either deal with it or leave. It's not pornography. Grow some ****ing nuts.

[Midnight9795]

Originally posted by MrMister
That picture might be filthy and immoral, but filth is the spice of life.
Just ignore it. Ignore it ignore it ignore it, Hilary Clinton. Look away.  How can a drawing be offensive to anyone? Don't create problems like you're some bitchy 30-something mother who caught her son playing Grand Theft Auto. Any female members can choose to either deal with it or leave. It's not pornography. Grow some ******* nuts.

lmao! I completely agree, sorry Ed  :p

[Archem]

Now, don't go messing with the best sig on Charas, Ed. Leave things to the professionals, not to the easily offended. Besides, my sig is horrendously offensive to some people.

[Meiscool-2]

Um, wow, someone that's not a 40 year-old mother complaining about porn on the internet. Of all things.....

[Desimodontidae]

Originally posted by MrMister
Okay. Should use html, not this ridiculous SF Code. Tags have to be capitalized? What the hell is that?

I second that.

[charaman]

Originally posted by Desimodontidae

quote:

Originally posted by MrMister Okay. Should use html, not this ridiculous SF Code. Tags have to be capitalized? What the hell is that?

I second that.

Thirded.


Also, that glitch the the
tag gets cuaght in links when a space is not added after it.

[SaiKar]

Originally posted by smokey_locs2002
All those sticky topics..it's as if Charas is a honey bun.

Good call. Working on it.

[Grandy]

Originally posted by X_marks_the_ed
Charas has always been perfect in my eyes, but there's just one problem I have with it.

The rules state that lvl 3 offensive images are prohibited. (No pornographic images)

Yet, I've noticed that many users have avatars that are just barely below pornography are not being taken care of. We have female members, and i'm sure they'd be really offended by such images.

As an example, http://charas-project.net/forum/viewmember.php?userid=20434
" target="_blank">http://charas-project.net/forum/viewmember.php?userid=20434

I have no problem with the user, just the signature.

It's just barely below pornography.

 

We have female members

 You mean such as... Kasumi_Sakura?

 And that's nothing compared to some forums, and even so those are against pornogaphy as much as Charas.

[charaman]

Originally posted by Grandy

quote:

We have female members

 You mean such as... Kasumi_Sakura?

BAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Archem]

Word. Comma, word: Liek. Hate that word.

[smokey_locs2002]

Originally posted by Archem2
Word. Comma, word: Liek. Hate that word.

and I hate the DS but I stay quite about it.