Scientists have suceeded in turning gay rams straight

[ZeroKirbyX]

So, by your opinions, you pick and choose what parts you believe in and make up things Jesus may have said and count or discount his statements at will? Interesting process yeh got thar.

[Black Massacre]

1 Corinthians 6:9
  Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders

Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another.



Romans 1:24-27

 24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.

 26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.



Right from the flippin' bible.

[Darrellito]

Eh, why don't you just admit your a homophobe? God doesn't seem to mind the gays. Only stupid bigits do. They hide behind God so they can say what they want to say without feeling bad.

[elementalhero76]

Originally posted by Black Massacre
1 Corinthians 6:9
  Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders

Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another.



Romans 1:24-27

 24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.

 26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.



Right from the flippin' bible.

Right there that is what I took from the bible. The new testament Ha! Now find somewhat to what I said:  It is in mathew 19 1-12 That disscusses divorse. But I did had its meaning towards to gay marrige too. Maybe I was wrong there. This passsage discusses that it is unlawful to divorse for god created one man and one woman to marry and become one flesh if you divorse it makes it not two into one but one into one flesh. Devores only applied if it was unlawful (the marrage.)

[Darrellito]

lol

All this over rams ****ing other rams....

[elementalhero76]

Yep we are having it too far overblown. I love the internet it brings all sorts of people together to lash out as if they all want to eat each other alive.

[Osmose]

Hehehe... Gay "Rams"

I'm freaking hilarious.

[Razor]

Originally posted by Darrellito
Eh, why don't you just admit your a homophobe? God doesn't seem to mind the gays. Only stupid bigits do. They hide behind God so they can say what they want to say without feeling bad.

Hahaha, more points for you.

[ZeroKirbyX]

Originally posted by Black Massacre
1 Corinthians 6:9
  Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders

Romans 1:24-27

 24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.

 26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.

Seeing as how the word homosexual wasn't used until the 19th century, it is impossible to attain a translation of the word from old hebrew, therefore quote 1 shows a bias in translation that for all we know changed the who quote. Disqualified.

Quote 2 could easily be related to haveing relations with a sinful whore, not neccessarily one of the same sex.

The first half of quote three could relate to having sex with animals. The due penalty may not be damnation, but could easily refer to something as simple as getting kicked in the groin.

No matter how it condemns being a queer, specification as to the punishment is never revealed. Saying gay will put you in heaven is ludicrous.

Stop being such a homophobe. I was gunna call you a faggy dicklick, but I'll such language to MrMister.

[Krynth]

If you only follow bits an pieces of a religion then dont go off quoting it... just shows how much of a dumb*** you can be and brings a bad name to religion itself...just as bad as racism... Yea I'm religious but I'm not going to pressure or go quoting it cause I still have my questions about it....

But yea putting religion aside though it does have some effect to my opinion...

If scientist want to keep gay animals straight then good its there choice but I doubt its going to get to the point of their extinction,  but them doing it for humans idk a waste of money?, seriously doubt we're dumb enough to allow ourselves to the point of extinction...I hope...but hell I'd rather it be natural reproduction than artificial means for our survival....if some gays want to have sex then thats their choice and doubt any of them are going to use w/e scientist come up with to keep them straight..all that is going to do is allow others to force their beliefs on others more...

[Blue_Strife]

-looks at homophobe bible freaks-

Huh.

And some people wonder why I choose not to follow the 'good book' -_-;;

[Meiscool-2]

Originally posted by ZeroKirbyX

Originally posted by Meiscool
There is no such thing as God. Saying there is a God is as plausible as saying a flying toilet created all life.

Well, no matter how much you link it there is no proof of evolution. For all we know we could have been like this in the first place and there could have been 1000's of different human things that sucked. Saying they're all linked is just as much speculation as saying God exists.[/B]

I never stated that I believe a retarded fishfrog grew legs and had hairy babies. I do think some sort of evolution exsists, but not something as extreem as humans originally starting out as fish. However, there has been an extreem amount of proof to support that birds came from lizards, which came from fish, so that might point something out.

Also, yes, evolution has been proven. There was a huge debate about it in the courts. Regardless if the theories of evolution are true or false, its been legally proven, which is enough for me.

I don't really have a theory as to why we exsist. I don't like to ponder such things. People waste their entire lives trying to find the answer to questions that are opinionated.

EDIT: Eh, y u h8 ghey pepole?

[Razor]

I'd like to see a theory on why we DON'T exist.

[ZeroKirbyX]

Meis, the Scopes trial didn't prove evolution existed. That entire trial was over the right to TEACH the theory of evolution as an accepted THEORY. Plus Scopes lost that trial. Any later trials I regarding it are the same, over the right to teach it as a theory, not as a fact. There is no such thing proof of a theory. They have supporting evidence, but proof never applies to theories.

[Meiscool-2]

"Proof never applies to theories."

Though true, its a shallow statement. Math is pretty much 100% theories, yet, everything is accepted to be true. You clearly said that almost all forms of math and problem solving in both numbers and science are not facts because they arn't 100% proven.

Also, in another thread, some time ago (I think it was the one where DragonBlaze had a fit that we didn't believe time could be manuplated), you stated that nothing can be 100% factually correct. What do you want then ZKX? You say without proof theories can't be 100% correct and hence you won't believe them, and you'll only accept a theory if its proven, yet you say that nothing can be 100% proven true in the term of a law.

I'm this sounds really dumb, meh, I'm tired. Gnight'