Net neutrality

[SonicChaos7]

Mother nature sucked on my wee-wee in preschool. I kid. But the earth will fix itself. Besides, I remember a few years ago when ti was way hotter than it is now.

[Sephiroth rocks]

I find it so stupid that everyone keeps arguing about who's the scapegoat when discussing enviriomental issues why can't they just fix the damn problems instead so that we don't have to breathe polluted air that constantly limits our lifespan?
Also a vulcano errupting isn't nearly as damaging for the planet as all the crap we let out in the atmosphere since it's spread all over the world while an erruption only causes local damage.
And on the american president thingy, I think everyone should critisize him if they don't agree with his politics, disallowing the critisism of a leader is a mark of a dictatorship after all.

[SonicChaos7]

Originally posted by Sephiroth rocks
I find it so stupid that everyone keeps arguing about who's the scapegoat when discussing enviriomental issues why can't they just fix the damn problems instead so that we don't have to breathe polluted air that constantly limits our lifespan?
Also a vulcano errupting isn't nearly as damaging for the planet as all the crap we let out in the atmosphere since it's spread all over the world while an erruption only causes local damage.
And on the american president thingy, I think everyone should critisize him if they don't agree with his politics, disallowing the critisism of a leader is a mark of a dictatorship after all.

Um... a volcano does do more damage to the planet. Don't know where you got that information. Think alternate fuel sources. Each one is a hazard. Hydrogen's problem is if you wreck. Hyrdogen alone is a powerful elements which can do some heavy *** damage. So, there's gotta be a way to contain it, or mix it with something that can be productive and not destructive. Solar energy is fine, but you need extra stuff with it. You can't just run on solar panels or solar cells. Wind energy, you'd have to have some massive turbines to get that **** going. Nuclear seems to be good, but there are risks involved as well, plus it must be done through nuclear fusion instead of fission. Fission leaves waste, which isn't good. People have even suggested ethanol. Ethanol comes from corn. Can we produce enough for all the cars in the world to run? HIGHLY unlikely. Petroleum is the easiest way, evironment friendly or not, at least for now. Eventually, alternative fuel sources should be made, and they should start being produced right now, but only in small numbers. I don't see what the hoopla is about saving the environment and the world. Everyone's acting like the impending doom is right around the corner. Our planet's existed for quite a long time and we're still alive and going. Stop whining and just worry about what's going on right now.

It depends on how you mean byu criticism. If the criticism presents a clear and present danger or a threat on his life, a person can be thrown in jail or worse. Criticizing the president is one thing, but blaming everything on him is another. Congress makes up all the ****, so blame them. In fact, blame the stupid mother fuckers who voted for everyone in congress.

[Sephiroth rocks]

Um yes actually the enviriomental damages are affecting the world right now. The ice at artic and antarctica are melting because of global warming and if it continues huge areas will be flooded. Also ethanol doesn't need to be made from corn it can be made from a long variety of products many that at the moment are useless by-products.

[SonicChaos7]

We're still not at the point where it's a need to worry. If we have a global flood, things will work out how they need. If we all die, oh well. It was meant to happen.

[Sephiroth rocks]

So you're basically saying that you don't give a **** about all the ppl who're gonna die in an eventual global flooding?

[SonicChaos7]

Tell me, how is STOPPING everything right now going to change anything? The ozone deteriorates itself little by little. We aid it little by little. We cannot stop events from happening. Slowing it down doesn't do anything either. It will happen eventually, so don't try to make me feel guilty about something that will happen regardless of what we do.

[Sephiroth rocks]

I'm not talking about stopping everything as said before ethanol can replace gas and diesel completely.

[ZeroKirbyX]

It CAN but it will be more costly. Now, do you think everyone would pay for a new, more expensive car to run or stick with what you have? To make it work you would have to replace the engines in every type of machine that runs on fossil fuels. Planes, cars boats, all would need more engines. And to make the effort work you would need to scrap the currently running ships and such to prevent more pollutants. That would have a tremendous effect on the worlds economy, for shipmengts of goods would be decreased. It would throw the world into another depression.

[SonicChaos7]

A war will get us out of depression!  

[Sephiroth rocks]

You wouldn't have to replace all fossil fueled engines, if all future engines were made to run with ethanol the fossil fueled would gradually disappear (in twenty years or so there would hardly be any left). Ppl would by forced to buy new cars though they would be more expensive to fuel anyway, a car seldom lasts for more than 15 years. Also a global depression would still be better than what's gonna happen if the fossil fueled engines are preserved.

[SonicChaos7]

So suffering, scraping for money is better than dying instantaneously when a huge wave of water smothers your ***?

[Sephiroth rocks]

Well there was a global depression in 1927 and ppl got past that one.

[SonicChaos7]

Ahem, WWII.

[ZeroKirbyX]

There were giagantic floods when the ice age ended. People got past that one.