Charas-Project

  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Calendar
  • Login
  • Register
*
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 

News:

New forum theme up and running!



  • Charas-Project »
  • Off-Topic »
  • All of all! »
  • PS3 not so expensive for what you get?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12

Author Topic: PS3 not so expensive for what you get?  (Read 28161 times)

Offline Drace

  • Sage
  • *
  • Posts: 5,199
(No subject)
« Reply #150 on: July 01, 2006, 06:07:02 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by drenrin2120
The way I'm looking at it is if you want better graphics it's gonna cost more. I mean, the PS was at first a lot more expensive than the SNES, and then the PS2 was more expensive than the PS1. I'm really not too surprised the PS3 costs so much. If the graphics, music, sounds and w/e do prove to actually be as great as they're said to be, then I think people can't really complain for 600 bucks. The PS4 will probably be something like 800 bucks. But again, everything else will be uber awesoem compared to the PS3.  Soon, I bet you anything, computers and game consoles will become as one. And then you'll have a TV, game console, and computer all as one. It's the only logical next step. As for me, I'm gonna wait till they invent holograms. :p


I want some Johnny Quest-like Virtual Reality.
Logged


Offline Darkfox

  • These spectacles do nothing
  • Staff
  • Over 9000!
  • *
  • Posts: 10,215
    • Chaos Realm - Home of the God Beasts
(No subject)
« Reply #151 on: July 01, 2006, 06:30:22 AM »
The only reason I'd get PS3 is for the upcoming Shin Megami Tensei remake. They don't bore you with long drawn out cinamatics.

As for Nintendo, they are making games too short and easy. Possibly the better running series they have is Zelda I suppose. Maybe SSB too.

Otherwise they've kinda dropped on playtime and challenge.
Logged



Offline Kijuki_Magazaki

  • Member
  • Exemplar
  • *
  • Posts: 1,966
(No subject)
« Reply #152 on: July 01, 2006, 08:10:11 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by DragonBlaze
I'm a little confuse, you say the ps3 prefers graphics over gameplay, and thats one of the reasons you don't like it.

A system plays no part in the gameplay of games, well actually it does it two ways. First, the controller, the ps3 controller is a controller type that most people like, so they're not doing anything bad there. The other way a system affects gameplay is simply its ability to run the game. The ps3 has that ability.

You can't say the ps3 prefers graphics over gameplay. The games themselves determain the gameplay, not the system. The ps3 is simply working on the areas that they can work on as a system, such as its ability to handle good graphics.


Gah?! I am not saying IT PREFERS GRAPHICS OVER GAMEPLAY.
 I am saying that IT LOOKS THAT WAY TO ME.

there's a difference between that!

 You guys so mispoint my words and twist them. I clearly emphasize the term ***I SEE***.
Logged

Offline Weregnome

  • The Drunken University Student
  • Exemplar
  • *
  • Posts: 1,007
  • I'm 21 years old and an university student.
(No subject)
« Reply #153 on: July 01, 2006, 08:55:58 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
For me, and because the only thing I looked at AND EVEN heard from a ps3 system: graphics.


The PS3 has the ability, due to the Cell Processor, to allow for mulitple calculations to made, instead fot he one calculation being done at a time. This allows for PROPER mulit tasking. The engine allows for the system to allow for alot of things to happen during a game, so instead of being in a fight where your meant to be fighting a 10000 soldiers and you only get like 50.. you actually can get something around 10000 soldiers. The system is built to allow alot more area, characters and events to actually go on in the game. With multi tasking, and the the fact that thje system can built a landscape on its own with only satellite imagines and height data. the engine is impressive. Either E3 2004-05 showed inofrmation on this
Logged
えと。。。今日は 雨が 降そうですね。。。 

Offline Kijuki_Magazaki

  • Member
  • Exemplar
  • *
  • Posts: 1,966
(No subject)
« Reply #154 on: July 01, 2006, 09:25:17 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Weregnome
quote:
Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
For me, and because the only thing I looked at AND EVEN heard from a ps3 system: graphics.


The PS3 has the ability, due to the Cell Processor, to allow for mulitple calculations to made, instead fot he one calculation being done at a time. This allows for PROPER mulit tasking. The engine allows for the system to allow for alot of things to happen during a game, so instead of being in a fight where your meant to be fighting a 10000 soldiers and you only get like 50.. you actually can get something around 10000 soldiers. The system is built to allow alot more area, characters and events to actually go on in the game. With multi tasking, and the the fact that thje system can built a landscape on its own with only satellite imagines and height data. the engine is impressive. Either E3 2004-05 showed inofrmation on this


Oro o.O
Logged

Offline Almeidaboo

  • Leader
  • *
  • Posts: 2,384
  • Attor...nope, software developer now!
(No subject)
« Reply #155 on: July 01, 2006, 10:28:32 AM »
There is no doubt that the PS3 is superior in most aspects, and due to itīs hardware itīll give much more space for new ideas and infinite other possibilities.

What they gotta be careful is that they donīt make context empty games. There is absolutely no reason in making beautiful graphics for games that arenīt thrilling or interesting when it comes to the story.
Logged

Sig by Lucas_irineu

Offline Kijuki_Magazaki

  • Member
  • Exemplar
  • *
  • Posts: 1,966
(No subject)
« Reply #156 on: July 01, 2006, 10:39:38 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Almeidaboo
There is absolutely no reason in making beautiful graphics for games that arenīt thrilling or interesting when it comes to the story.


SOmeone who understands my plea.
Logged

Offline Osmose

  • So freakin' inactive
  • Royal
  • *
  • Posts: 3,041
(No subject)
« Reply #157 on: July 01, 2006, 11:44:21 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
Gah?! I am not saying IT PREFERS GRAPHICS OVER GAMEPLAY.
 I am saying that IT LOOKS THAT WAY TO ME.

there's a difference between that!

 You guys so mispoint my words and twist them. I clearly emphasize the term ***I SEE***.


This is a games debate. Your position right now is basically "Stop trying to support your side of the argument, because I've already said that I'm biased and I don't want anyone to continue talking about it." You don't HAVE to reply or read. You've already made your point, why can't others make theirs?
Logged
Hrm.

Offline Kijuki_Magazaki

  • Member
  • Exemplar
  • *
  • Posts: 1,966
(No subject)
« Reply #158 on: July 01, 2006, 11:52:19 AM »
No no you see, that's the point; people dont get my point.
Logged

Offline Osmose

  • So freakin' inactive
  • Royal
  • *
  • Posts: 3,041
(No subject)
« Reply #159 on: July 01, 2006, 02:13:44 PM »
They do. They understand that your opinion is that all you see frmo the PS3 is graphics. However, you're misinterpreting their attempts to show you otherwise as them accusing you of something.

It looks like that to you, but they're trying to change how you see it.
Logged
Hrm.

Offline DragonBlaze

  • A Wild DB Appeared!
  • Royal
  • *
  • Posts: 3,329
(No subject)
« Reply #160 on: July 01, 2006, 02:47:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
quote:
Originally posted by DragonBlaze
I'm a little confuse, you say the ps3 prefers graphics over gameplay, and thats one of the reasons you don't like it.

A system plays no part in the gameplay of games, well actually it does it two ways. First, the controller, the ps3 controller is a controller type that most people like, so they're not doing anything bad there. The other way a system affects gameplay is simply its ability to run the game. The ps3 has that ability.

You can't say the ps3 prefers graphics over gameplay. The games themselves determain the gameplay, not the system. The ps3 is simply working on the areas that they can work on as a system, such as its ability to handle good graphics.


Gah?! I am not saying IT PREFERS GRAPHICS OVER GAMEPLAY.
 I am saying that IT LOOKS THAT WAY TO ME.

there's a difference between that!

 You guys so mispoint my words and twist them. I clearly emphasize the term ***I SEE***.


Quote
I dont want the PS3 pricisely because it prefers graphics over gameplay.


So... by saying that you said you SAW that was happening. You stated that as a fact, not as an opinion. Maybe its not the way you meant to say it, but thats what it looks like. And nowhere do I see the words "I see". I wasn't twisting your words, I was just taking them exactly how they were written.


I started saving up for my ps3! I'm taking $20 out of my paycheck every week and placing it in my ps3 savings box (my savings box is the inside of a breath of fire 4 psx case). At this rate, every 5 weeks I'll get $100, in 30 weeks, I'll have $600. When the system drops $100 and comes out with a good, game, and when I have enough money saved, I'll buy it. :D
Logged
Hell Yeah! Just recovered all my old rm2k/3 games from my 10 year old, broken laptop hard drive that had been formatted and had a new OS installed on it. Oh, and I did all of this from my phone. WIN

Offline Kijuki_Magazaki

  • Member
  • Exemplar
  • *
  • Posts: 1,966
(No subject)
« Reply #161 on: July 01, 2006, 06:54:10 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Osmose
They do. They understand that your opinion is that all you see frmo the PS3 is graphics. However, you're misinterpreting their attempts to show you otherwise as them accusing you of something.

It looks like that to you, but they're trying to change how you see it.


They can't. It's too late :P
Logged

Offline aboutasoandthis

  • Exemplar
  • *
  • Posts: 1,915
  • Talking sucks.
(No subject)
« Reply #162 on: July 01, 2006, 08:59:13 PM »
To you above, what makes good gameplay and storyline?

Maybe you'll like Assassin's Creed. It's very politically minded. It's supposed to have a lot of gameplay too.

BTW, I'm probably going to get a Wii first (I'M NOT A FANBOY TO EITHER) simply because of the price. I might get a PS3 if I can find a job before school starts.
Logged
My pokemon bring all the nerds to the yard, and they're like you wanna trade cards? Darn right, I wanna trade cards, I could trade this, but not my charizard.  



Offline MrMister

  • damn u vile woman
  • Royal
  • *
  • Posts: 3,506
(No subject)
« Reply #163 on: July 01, 2006, 09:18:12 PM »
If that's the way you see it, then that's your opinion. Stop saying it's not your opinion when you don't have anything to back it up.
' You guys so mispoint my words and twist them.'
No, you're just contradicting yourself over and over. So, you are doing the twistage by yourself.
Also, If they make Jade Cocoon 3 for PS3 I will spooge all over the TV ninety four times.
Logged
you look like an orphan

Offline Kijuki_Magazaki

  • Member
  • Exemplar
  • *
  • Posts: 1,966
(No subject)
« Reply #164 on: July 01, 2006, 10:21:32 PM »
I am not contradicting myself.

I said that how I see it and I dont want to get it because that's how I see it.Yes it is opinion; dur. I think that's beyond fact. I am very judgemental toward playstaion three, what can I say. However just because of that i do not intend to say every game in the ps3 will suck, i am pretty sure there'll be people who claim good games at least. As for me I rely on what the media and gurus say, then compare to my own opinions.


And you say i am twisting my words when moose just said i am repeating myself. OMG CLASH OF THE SUP3RPOWRZ

 
Quote
No, you're just contradicting yourself over and over. So, you are doing the twistage by yourself.


I am bored and i am enjoying this; elaborate.
Logged

  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12
« previous next »
  • Charas-Project »
  • Off-Topic »
  • All of all! »
  • PS3 not so expensive for what you get?
 

  • SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
  • XHTML
  • 2O11
  • RSS
  • WAP2
  • Simple Machines Forum