Bonk Bonk Bonk!

[I Have a Sandwich]

Originally posted by plightofthepureblood
But why make your job harder?

How long did they think this over?

It sounds like the kind of crap thought up during a session of bong hits.


A three strike youre out system would be far more effective....

Right now, its "Maybe if you get bonked enough, we'll ban you for a few days."

If you get 3 bonks, they should ban you....
Because this is freakin laughable.

Three bonks = ban? Three people got a bonk for goofin around in a thread and involving no one but themselves. Doing that three times really constitute a ban?

[Black Massacre]

Originally posted by plightofthepureblood
You mean a "bong rips" topic? hehe

No!


Also, do bonks get recorded in the mod log file?

[plightofthepureblood]

Not so much....Im sure you get what Im saying.....


With this system there is too much grey area.....


With this system there is too much ghey area too....

[FFL2and3rocks]

Originally posted by DragonBlaze
Seriously, WHY should a mod have to HIDE their identity when they're pointing out the rules to someone?

Let's say someone is being a jerk, and I send a PM to the person telling him to knock it off or whatever. The person reads it, and just thinks  "Pfft, it's just FFL, I don't have to take him seriously!" and continues what he's doing regardless.
If you don't know who the mod is, then you can't just disregard it on account of not liking the particular mod who sent it for whatever reason.

[I Have a Sandwich]

Originally posted by FFL2and3rocks

quote:

Originally posted by DragonBlaze Seriously, WHY should a mod have to HIDE their identity when they're pointing out the rules to someone?

Let's say someone is being a jerk, and I send a PM to the person telling him to knock it off or whatever. The person reads it, and just thinks  "Pfft, it's just FFL, I don't have to take him seriously!" and continues what he's doing regardless.
If you don't know who the mod is, then you can't just disregard it on account of not liking the particular mod who sent it for whatever reason.

And you think people will take a faceless image more seriously becaaaaaaauuuuse?

"Pfft, its just a message, who gives a f***?"

[plightofthepureblood]

Originally posted by FFL2and3rocks

quote:

Originally posted by DragonBlaze Seriously, WHY should a mod have to HIDE their identity when they're pointing out the rules to someone?

Let's say someone is being a jerk, and I send a PM to the person telling him to knock it off or whatever. The person reads it, and just thinks  "Pfft, it's just FFL, I don't have to take him seriously!" and continues what he's doing regardless.
If you don't know who the mod is, then you can't just disregard it on account of not liking the particular mod who sent it for whatever reason.

That doesnt explain anything.

If a member is that disrespectfull in the first place, to the extend of totally disregarding a moderators authority......

Then "strike one"

Let the jerk know that they done F**k with (insert mod name here)

It will let them know that they are on thin Ice.



The anonymity is bu!!$****, dude.

If somebody disregards your authoritah as a moderator, they should be punished.....And Know their retirbutor. Its friggin prfessional courtesy.....

Thats right......

UNPROFESSIONAL.

THIS IS AN AMATEUR TACTIC.



If you get arrested, its your g0ddamn right to know the cops name that arrested you (here it is anyways, in the free world), and his badge number, his reason for arresting, and reason for suspicion....
And what happens if you dont know this information? The cops story is bull$****....and the case is thrown out....BECAUSE IT HAS LOST ALL CREDIBILITY.

Anyhow, Ive gotten my two cents in........Good luck with this anti-democratic  little game youre playing....

[I Have a Sandwich]

Dude, just for saying 'authoritah' I read the rest of that post with the voice idea of Cartman XD

[plightofthepureblood]

wow....its a pretty funny post, when you read it as eric cartman.....

Good call, dude.

[Kijuki_Magazaki]

First of all, I had not come to this place in a big while, but when today I was told of this (for obvious reasons), I couldn't help but to come here, and see for myself. And... oh my God!

True.
vVv
VvV

Originally posted by DragonBlaze
This sounds VERY stupid. Seriously, WHY should a mod have to HIDE their identity when they're pointing out the rules to someone?

What if someone got a bonk, but they don't know exactly what for, who would  they contact if they had questions on what they did wrong?

We should just stick with mods PMing members or having them just point out what they did wrong in the topic. Members could  then ask the mod on what they did wrong if they didn't understand the rule.

Mods shouldn't have to hide anything, especially their identity.

No mod should hide their identity or was someone hurt by someone recoiling?

And I also agree with this being gay, and being a joke; Treat people like adults, call this a warning system, not a bonk system, regardless of how childly they act.

Sounds like a way to try to keep order by punching someone in the back for bullying instead of comming foward to them and telling them stop it, and explaining the rule broken, because annoying someone isn't directly a broken rule, little more spamming. From what I've been told spam has been made more general than ever, and has only been asnwered to with PMs about annoying other people, but now now switching that around without even the smallest warning, and with a new mediocre system, that you are seeing nobody is liking ('noobs' and seniors alike), it's starting to seem like someone is/has been running into problems and is running out of ideas. And if you think that only the staff needs to know who has bonked then... I won't explain here. You people know that this isn't precisely right.

Will this be used by mods in their station? Osmose is hardly a mod (since he only holds access to modship because he is supposed to be running the contest which long died), yet he has been taken into full consideration for full use in this programme.

Moreover, do you know how this can backfire? How much can this be exploited? Unless you people have a log of this thing (which by the little information given sounds like there isn't any kind of real supervision), people can go making fake screenshots of "bonks" and result to a great smack in the face to the staff if this is not watched.


If you don't believe me in that, there's something in the eyes of every mod here can't deny: Carmen would've loved having this.

[Meiscool-2]

Yeah, I have to agree with FFL.

No one respects FFL.

[Kijuki_Magazaki]

Originally posted by Black Massacre

quote:

Originally posted by plightofthepureblood You mean a "bong rips" topic? hehe

No!


Also, do bonks get recorded in the mod log file?

Not in the member one. I have checked.

Irony tells us that the log file shown to us was to let us view who did what, however this "tool" merely contradicts such thing, if not all, the idea is contradicted.

[Meiscool-2]

Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki

quote:

Originally posted by Black Massacre quote: Originally posted by plightofthepureblood You mean a "bong rips" topic? hehe No! Also, do bonks get recorded in the mod log file?

Not in the member one. I have checked.

Irony tells us that the log file shown to us was to let us view who did what, however this "tool" merely contradicts such thing.

Hey! Ure back! I thought you finally cut yourself or something.

[Kijuki_Magazaki]

Originally posted by Meiscool

quote:

Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki quote: Originally posted by Black Massacre quote: Originally posted by plightofthepureblood You mean a "bong rips" topic? hehe No! Also, do bonks get recorded in the mod log file? Not in the member one. I have checked. Irony tells us that the log file shown to us was to let us view who did what, however this "tool" merely contradicts such thing.

Hey! Ure back! I thought you finally cut yourself or something.

No, people made rumors about me, because they didn't like me, or apperantly I represented a sort of "threat".

The only thing I cut was this place. But I had to just come back after being told this and watch how this has come to be and smirk at it, like well, most are probably thinking.

[WarxePB]

Let me put it this way:

I don't CARE what you guys think about bonks. Alex made the system because we thought it would be a good idea, and unless you can prove DEFINITIVELY that it is a bad idea, we're not going to remove it. Whining and saying "This is gay" is not proof.

Yeah, guess that makes me a fascist. Guess that also makes Lord Raffles right - the mod team's just a bunch of Jew-hating fascists who have no life, so we pick on inferior regular members.

This is like the whole Troll Kingdom thing - the whole thing fell apart because you guys didn't like Saikar's idea. Which is fine - this is the free world - but none of the mod team's ever claimed that Charas is a democracy. You guys get some say in the decisions around here, but it's ultimately up to us to decide on them.

Say what you will, but know that it doesn't matter. And if you don't like that, deal with it. If you want to change it, go ahead and try. Replace Saikar with Meiscool, and we'll see how long Charas lasts.

Kijuki: If you've come here just to be a nuisance, don't even bother. We're not going to put up with any of your shit.

[Meiscool-2]

Kij: Yeah. I never thought you were emo. I just thought you were wierd and psychopathic.

Warxe: Charas would rule with me in charge, other then the fact that people would leave because I've been unruly deemed "irresponsible". Aside from that, at least I'm active.