Charas-Project

  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Calendar
  • Login
  • Register
*
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 

News:

Click here to join us on IRC (#charas on irc.freenode.net)!



  • Charas-Project »
  • Off-Topic »
  • All of all! »
  • Steampunk to broad?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Steampunk to broad?  (Read 7940 times)

Offline supasora

  • A true mexican hero.
  • Acolyte
  • *
  • Posts: 398
Steampunk to broad?
« on: August 23, 2009, 11:17:12 PM »
I like the whole steampunk style its cool. Im making this thread though because I feel the definition has become WAY to big. The other day my sister was trying to tell me that Mad Max and Final Fantasy 1-5 and #8 were steampunk. She also said something to the effect that anything with an airship regardless of how its powerd is steampunk. Any thoughts?
Logged
The hero of Canton, The man they call Jayne...

Offline supasora

  • A true mexican hero.
  • Acolyte
  • *
  • Posts: 398
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2009, 11:25:00 PM »
Quote from: lucas_irineu on August 23, 2009, 11:20:16 PM
My thoughts: Your sister is stupid.
Well thing is I searched on google and other people say the same things as her.
Logged
The hero of Canton, The man they call Jayne...

Offline A Forgotten Legend

  • Your neighborhood box of colors
  • Royal
  • *
  • Posts: 4,428
    • Website
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2009, 01:13:33 AM »
It also depends on the time.  1 and 2 are based in a time with little actual technology.  And having an airship give a steampunk effect, however, I would put them more into the fantasy category.
Logged

Offline supasora

  • A true mexican hero.
  • Acolyte
  • *
  • Posts: 398
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2009, 01:23:19 AM »
Quote from: A Forgotten Legend on August 24, 2009, 01:13:33 AM
It also depends on the time.  1 and 2 are based in a time with little actual technology.  And having an airship give a steampunk effect, however, I would put them more into the fantasy category.
I'd say 1-5 are fantasy, 6 is steampunk, 7 is cyberpunk (which is not a sub catagory of steampunk like my sister said), 8 is modern/sci fi, 9 is fantasy again, 10 is about a guy from a sci fi past going to a fantasy land
Logged
The hero of Canton, The man they call Jayne...

Offline Archem

  • One, one too many schizophrenic tendancies
  • Global Moderator
  • Over 9000!
  • *
  • Posts: 15,013
  • I made a fortune in toothpicks, but I lost it all in a fire.
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #4 on: August 24, 2009, 04:04:48 AM »
So, yeah, ign'ant ****.
Logged

Offline Prpl_Mage

  • Administrator
  • Sage
  • *
  • Posts: 7,645
  • The Administrator Mage
    • Check out our itch website
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #5 on: August 24, 2009, 06:38:29 AM »
Mad max is more post-apocalyptic.
The first couple final fantasy is more fantasy because there were very few steampunk elements.

FF 9 is closer to steampunk since they had steampowered ships and the mist, they characters also dress quite olde'.
Also  6, many steamy stuff there.
7,8 are more sci-fi than steampunk.
10 isn't neither sci-fi nor steampunk.
12 sucks

Steampunk is the future(or something like it) if we stuck to steamengines, clockwork, quicksilver and all those stuff. Japanese people like the thoughts of it.
(PS, V for vendetta is more Neo-something* than actual steampunk.
Logged
Cool RPGM Project!
Sprite till you die

Oh my god, this was ...10 years ago...

Offline Archem

  • One, one too many schizophrenic tendancies
  • Global Moderator
  • Over 9000!
  • *
  • Posts: 15,013
  • I made a fortune in toothpicks, but I lost it all in a fire.
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2009, 07:20:20 AM »
Quote from: Prpl_Mage on August 24, 2009, 06:38:29 AM
Steampunk is the future(or something like it) if we stuck to steamengines, clockwork, quicksilver and all those stuff.
I'm nor a steampunk professor or anything, but I always thought it was a "what if, about a hundred years back, people built technology decades ahead of their time that focused on steam power" thing.

Also, I'm going to start calling Supasora "SS". Yes, there's Nazism reference there. So what?
Logged

Offline HobomasterXXX

  • Your eyes. Are an ocean. Your breasts. Are also an ocean.
  • Leader
  • *
  • Posts: 2,700
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #7 on: August 24, 2009, 07:47:55 AM »
Quote from: Archem2 on August 24, 2009, 07:20:20 AM
I'm nor a steampunk professor or anything, but I always thought it was a "what if, about a hundred years back, people built technology decades ahead of their time that focused on steam power" thing.
I'm pretty sure you're right.
Logged

1:24 PM - [Razor]: I think
1:24 PM - [Razor]: I almost fell off my chair
1:24 PM - [Razor]: in anticipation for DICK

Offline supasora

  • A true mexican hero.
  • Acolyte
  • *
  • Posts: 398
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #8 on: August 24, 2009, 09:06:47 AM »
Quote from: Prpl_Mage on August 24, 2009, 06:38:29 AM
12 sucks...
The best thing I heard all day.
Logged
The hero of Canton, The man they call Jayne...

Offline MissingName

  • Here you go. Juicy Fruit. Happy?
  • Exemplar
  • *
  • Posts: 1,919
  • The scotch is well hidden. So scram.
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #9 on: August 24, 2009, 12:47:53 PM »
My sister is playing XII now.

Gotta say, give me a copy of VI, VII or VIII and I'm happy.

Quote from: Archem2 on August 24, 2009, 07:20:20 AM
Also, I'm going to start calling Supasora "SS". Yes, there's Nazism reference there. So what?

Godwin's law
« Last Edit: August 24, 2009, 02:09:48 PM by MissingName »
Logged
<sig></sig>

Offline Cerebus

  • The Poison Lord
  • Royal
  • *
  • Posts: 3,486
  • Chemical Rules
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #10 on: August 24, 2009, 05:10:15 PM »
The Schutzstaffel, abbreviated SS, was a major Nazi organization under Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party.
Logged

Offline Darkfox

  • These spectacles do nothing
  • Staff
  • Over 9000!
  • *
  • Posts: 10,215
    • Chaos Realm - Home of the God Beasts
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #11 on: August 24, 2009, 07:16:54 PM »
Steampunk IS variable. It can have fantasy elements, heck, it is a KIND of fantasy. Just that it has to be more technologically Steampunk than just having an airship. Needs more steampunk technology and elements, like gear driven machinery, boilers, etc.
Logged



Offline supasora

  • A true mexican hero.
  • Acolyte
  • *
  • Posts: 398
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #12 on: August 24, 2009, 07:21:23 PM »
Like this?
Logged
The hero of Canton, The man they call Jayne...

Offline Legacy of Elecrusher

  • Totally awesome.
  • Acolyte
  • *
  • Posts: 349
  • Please wait while I devise a witty remark.
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #13 on: August 24, 2009, 07:41:47 PM »
Quote from: supasora on August 24, 2009, 07:21:23 PM
Like this?

Yeah, it's kind of like that
Logged

Offline fruckert

  • Star-Star-Star-Star
  • Sage
  • *
  • Posts: 8,148
  • Not intended for public consumption
Re: Steampunk to broad?
« Reply #14 on: August 24, 2009, 08:04:58 PM »
Archem is the one who hit it closest to home.
And if you want to see one of the best Steampunk definitions out there, go find a copy of Arcanum: of Steamworks and Magick Obscura.
Best Steampunk game out there, IMPO.
...
Despite there being very scant few games that can qualify as Steampunk.
Logged
Quote
Ellie: I had a slice of ham in my hand. I was going to drop it, so I slapped it hard. It attached itself to the wall

  • Print
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »
  • Charas-Project »
  • Off-Topic »
  • All of all! »
  • Steampunk to broad?
 

  • SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
  • XHTML
  • 2O11
  • RSS
  • WAP2
  • Simple Machines Forum