PS3 not so expensive for what you get?

[Drace]

Ok, I've heard someone who said that people will buy a PS3 because they're graphic whores. Let me say two things.

XBox and XBox 360.

I mean... come on. Saying the PS3 is for graphic whores and the two XBoxen not? That's like saying that you're gay and Elton John is not.

[GaryCXJk]

Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
So you are saying EVERYONE wants the ps3?

Meiscool, you are.

It's called drawing the wrong conclusion.

Originally posted by Osmose
2. There has been NO playable demo of Brawl yet. Your shot was from what could've been a pre-rendered movie, and most likely was, considering that everyone was standing there and not fighting.[/B]

Interdeed, although I don't agree with the pre-rendered thing, because the graphics did look crap at the moment. No anti-aliasing and such. It would be a shame if it in fact were pre-rendered without anti-aliasing it.

I would still love to say that DarkFlood2 is a fanboy without proper argumentation.

I don't like XBox 360, simply because of my biased opinion, and because I just don't like the games. Call me a fanboy, but it's my opinion, I'm not trying to force it on anybody.

You, on the other hand, do.

That fact alone makes you a fanboy.

Originally posted by Drace
I mean... come on. Saying the PS3 is for graphic whores and the two XBoxen not? That's like saying that you're gay and Elton John is not.

Wait, Elton John is gay?

[Osmose]

I like the 360, I just don't like buying it. Call of Duty 2 is best enjoyed with friends anyway.

[Kijuki_Magazaki]

Originally posted by GaryCXJk
It's called drawing the wrong conclusion.

Originally posted by GaryCXJk

With that I meant that it is bullcrap if you say that you don't want the PS3, because it prefers graphics over gameplay.

No you are generalizing and calling people like me liars and BSers.

I dont want the PS3 pricisely because it prefers graphics over gameplay. I think I have made ethat clear enough through all out all these gaming arguments. I like nice graphics, who doesn't? But all I see from PS3 is that. That doesnt down right cut it for me... and the price.

[Drace]

Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki

quote:

Originally posted by GaryCXJk It's called drawing the wrong conclusion.

quote:

Originally posted by GaryCXJk With that I meant that it is bullcrap if you say that you don't want the PS3, because it prefers graphics over gameplay.

No you are generalizing and calling people like me liars and BSers.

I dont want the PS3 pricisely because it prefers graphics over gameplay. I think I have made ethat clear enough through all out all these gaming arguments. I like nice graphics, who doesn't? But all I see from PS3 is that. That doesnt down right cut it for me... and the price.

Come on, you can't judge a whole system by a few games you might have seen. I mean, it does have MGS4. That's story AND graphics holding hands, kissing, making love and getting a baby called wowzors.

[GaryCXJk]

Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki
No you are generalizing and calling people like me liars and BSers.

Again, drawing wrong conclusions.

I only said that it is bullcrap when people hate PS3 just because they say PS3 is focused more on graphics rather than gameplay, and that they prefer gameplay over graphics. That is not true. Not even I can ignore the graphics.

And Drace just showed you how you are BSing. I mean, have you ever PLAYED the PS3? No? Yes? NO.

Can you predict the future and say PS3 will only have graphically good games and crap gameplay? NO.

So, my conclusion from that: BULLCRAP.

[aboutasoandthis]

Umm...how exactly did this turn into a PS3/Wii war? I thought it was comparing its price to a Blue Ray player. With my three sentence post I feel insignificant. :unsure:

[SaiKar]

Meh I don't care of the PS3 can do my taxes and perform a mean tapdance number. I'm not concerned with how many features it has or how much value I'm getting in the package. $600 is just too damn much for a hobby like video games. Give me less extras, less graphics, and less cost and we'll talk.

[drenrin2120]

The way I'm looking at it is if you want better graphics it's gonna cost more. I mean, the PS was at first a lot more expensive than the SNES, and then the PS2 was more expensive than the PS1. I'm really not too surprised the PS3 costs so much. If the graphics, music, sounds and w/e do prove to actually be as great as they're said to be, then I think people can't really complain for 600 bucks. The PS4 will probably be something like 800 bucks. But again, everything else will be uber awesoem compared to the PS3.  Soon, I bet you anything, computers and game consoles will become as one. And then you'll have a TV, game console, and computer all as one. It's the only logical next step. As for me, I'm gonna wait till they invent holograms. :p

[DarkFlood2]

If I wanted something that was 500-600 dollars, I would save that money and upgrade my computer.

[drenrin2120]

Originally posted by DarkFlood2
If I wanted something that was 500-600 dollars, I would save that money and upgrade my computer.

If you don't want the PS3, then don't get it. If someone wants to spend 500-600 bucks on it, let thme. It's their money.

[Kijuki_Magazaki]

Originally posted by GaryCXJk

quote:

Originally posted by Kijuki_Magazaki No you are generalizing and calling people like me liars and BSers.

Again, drawing wrong conclusions.

I only said that it is bullcrap when people hate PS3 just because they say PS3 is focused more on graphics rather than gameplay, and that they prefer gameplay over graphics. That is not true. Not even I can ignore the graphics.

And Drace just showed you how you are BSing. I mean, have you ever PLAYED the PS3? No? Yes? NO.

Can you predict the future and say PS3 will only have graphically good games and crap gameplay? NO.

So, my conclusion from that: BULLCRAP.

Yes I was drawing to conclusion based on your very vague 1st opinion and statement on this matter.

And no I dont want to play it? I dont WANT TO OWN ONE? Why? Cause its my freaking damn opinion? Doesnt matter if I can't or can judge regardless of how beautiful the graphics are in it. I DONT WANT TO OWN ONE. Period. I sh*t you not.

And dont put freaking words in my mouth. NOTE and I QUOTE MYSELF:
"
I dont want the PS3 pricisely because it prefers graphics over gameplay. I think I have made ethat clear enough through all out all these gaming arguments. I like nice graphics, who doesn't? But all ***I see*** from PS3 is that. That doesnt down right cut it for me... and the price."

I did NOT EVER, FREAKING EVER, said all the games where going to be like that. Do you think that I am as stupid to believe that? You failed at knowing and arguing with me if you did.

I stated thats how I SAW it, and that's how is all looking, FOR ME. Do not go on.

FREAKING AGAIN:

I dont want the PS3 pricisely because it prefers graphics over gameplay. I think I have made ethat clear enough through all out all these gaming arguments. I like nice graphics, who doesn't? Butall I see from PS3 is that. That doesnt down right cut it for me... and the price.

Note durrs, I am talking about the system not the games, there'll always be great gaes from every system who the HELL can eny that? Point being I dont like the PS3 because no matter how you paint it, they look like graphic pitches.

Point and made. I dont want it. If I get it, it'll be to tape its destruction and put it on the  internet.

I judge the system by first impression. Oh it hasnt made a single good one for me at ALL.

And again before you say "drawing into conclusion"

 

I only said that it is bullcrap when people hate PS3 just because they say PS3 is focused more on graphics rather than gameplay, and that they prefer gameplay over graphics. That is not true. Not even I can ignore the graphics.

What is not true? Liking gameplay over graphics? If you dont believe there's people like that you fail this arguement.

I am not still understand what you are calling as BS.

For me, and because the only thing I looked at AND EVEN heard from a ps3 system: graphics.

Like I said, I like graphics who doesnt? But I DO NOT prefer  graphics over gameplay. And by this I dont mean games will be this way, oh no, i am not that naive as your ignorance proclaims. It's because thats all I see and hear from the PS3, the damn word "graphics". Its an over explotion thats drawing it a very bad image for some people, believe it or not. I am not the only with these thoughts, and it isnt because i love nintendo, but because thats the way it is.

I will buy a playstion 2 because i have good replay value games I'd like to play again, that arent really the best graphical ones around but that I effin love.

BUt the playstation 3. No, sorry, your are marketting to the effing wrong guy here.

Excuse the typos I am playing an MMO and had to post quick

[Razor]

Woo, looks like someone needs a cookie.

[DragonBlaze]

I'm a little confuse, you say the ps3 prefers graphics over gameplay, and thats one of the reasons you don't like it.

A system plays no part in the gameplay of games, well actually it does it two ways. First, the controller, the ps3 controller is a controller type that most people like, so they're not doing anything bad there. The other way a system affects gameplay is simply its ability to run the game. The ps3 has that ability.

You can't say the ps3 prefers graphics over gameplay. The games themselves determain the gameplay, not the system. The ps3 is simply working on the areas that they can work on as a system, such as its ability to handle good graphics.

[ZeroKirbyX]

A systems graphics are only as good as the producer of the game makes them. Yes, the PS2 could have some awesome graphics. But the game quality ranged from **** poor to near realistic on a case to case basis. The gamecube, while its graphics didn't aim to beat any records, seemed have games that many were at the same level of quality and I hope the Wii is the same. Granted graphis mean **** to me, but having a constant level of graphics I think is better than having a spaztic range. Thats just my opinion though, nobody start comin up to me and tellin me why my opinion is wrong.