Scientists have suceeded in turning gay rams straight

[MrMister]

Originally posted by Osmose
Hehehe... Gay "Rams"

I'm freaking hilarious.

omfgh
like peen
goin in2 butt O_O
hahahahhahehehehfeaiii
lamooo

[Smokey_locs2006]

Originally posted by MrMister
Gay people are unnatural, and things that are strange should be eliminated!

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!

[Ryan914]

Don't really care much about homosexuality, live and let live I suppose. I will only go against something if it harms innocent people.

However this research is interesting, it may help improve some standards, even if it is not used for altering hormonal balances, it is still another step closer to seeing how the brain really works.

[ZeroKirbyX]

Originally posted by Meiscool
"Proof never applies to theories."

Though true, its a shallow statement. Math is pretty much 100% theories, yet, everything is accepted to be true. You clearly said that almost all forms of math and problem solving in both numbers and science are not facts because they arn't 100% proven.

Also, in another thread, some time ago (I think it was the one where DragonBlaze had a fit that we didn't believe time could be manuplated), you stated that nothing can be 100% factually correct. What do you want then ZKX? You say without proof theories can't be 100% correct and hence you won't believe them, and you'll only accept a theory if its proven, yet you say that nothing can be 100% proven true in the term of a law.

I'm this sounds really dumb, meh, I'm tired. Gnight'

First off, I don't believe myself to have ever said math is a theory, as there is no hypothesis on math. We created math, we didn't create an explanation for it.

As for theories, I never accept theories as proof. I will accept a theory as a more plausible explanation than another theory, but that's about it. Perhaps I may have spoken myself poorly, I'm too lazy to read the old topic. If we were dealing with DB, I probably just rephrased the same thing 1000 times in hopes he would understand. By saying no theory is ever 100%, that was pretty much another way of saying theories are never law.

Too be honest, I am having a rather difficult time comprehending your post. Asnwering it is like solving a rubix cube: simple, but hard to go about.

[Smokey_locs2006]

Originally posted by Ryan914
Don't really care much about homosexuality, live and let live I suppose. I will only go against something if it harms innocent people.

However this research is interesting, it may help improve some standards, even if it is not used for altering hormonal balances, it is still another step closer to seeing how the brain really works.

DOODE Do you know what this means!!!

They can finally cure ZeroKirbyX.



OH SNAPS!


J/k
(not really)

[xJericho]

That's really bad,... just look at my profile

[Shady Ultima]

I personally think this sounds a lot like X-men 3... *in best Magneto voice* They will strike first blood..

No, I personally believe this is a good idea. For a parent, finding out their child is homosexual is a horrible thing. It's like losing a child, or at least the future. Finding out that you will never have grandchildren is devastating to parents. If this becomes available to the general public, it could potentially wipe out gays, because parents would not want their child to be homosexual.

Mind you, I don't care either way. I personally think they should continue with the research, and see what it can lead to. There are many things that we could learn from this that could help both our culture and other cultures, as the statement claiming that homosexual rams are not worth any money.

And ZKX there is a quote in the bible, I'd have to search for it. "A man shall not lay with another man as he should with a woman, or he shall face eternal damnation. As well, a man shall not share a bed with an animal lest he also face damnation" Now, the actual wording is probably slightly different, but that is what it said. I attended a Christian high school, and had to take religion for 14 years (Junior Kindergarden to Gr 12) not to mention that my parents are religious and go to church weekly. I myself am not religious, and I also do not favour the church's views on many issues.

 I personally believe everyone has the right to make their own choices. (bold so you don't miss it)

[Osmose]

I'd like to note that what you think a theory is and what science thinks a theory is are two different degrees of validity. A theory for us is something that might be proven. For science, that's a hypothesis.

However, it takes a crapload of verifiable proof for something to even qualify as a theory. Science holds itself to super-high expectations, and that evolution has gotten all the way to theory means that for decades scientists have been finding proof of evolution and documenting such proof, while very little has come to life that can disprove the theory. It takes a lot for something to be a theory in the scientific community.

[Darrellito]

The only reason they're coming up with this 'homosexual cure' is for farm animals. If a farm animal, such as a ram, doesn't mate with ewes and make offspring, then it's virtually useless. Eliminateing the gay's life choice would be like telling us who we could date and marry. I think that this thing is as dumb as cosmetic surgery. Being gay will not kill you. There is no reason to 'cure' it.

[Razor]

It should be noted that the bible that says that the gays will be damned for however long is the same bible that says women < men; they should remain silent and never teach. Who wants to listen to the bible?

[Trevlac]

Originally posted by elementalhero76
No the bible like any old text is too cryptic to understand or believe word by word, and as with any old text, most sayings and values do go out with the times. I base most of my values off of the ten commandmants.

Then you're a Jew, not a Christian. The Ten Commandments reside in what Christians refer to as the "Old Testament" which is, in fact, the Hebrew Torah. Good job, Jewmongerer. You fail at religion.

Dear elementalhero76,

No one wants to hear what you believe or your retarded opinions. Why not take all that dirt that just came out of your mouth and bury yourself with it?

P.S. Jesus loves everyone. Except you.

Sincerely,

-God

[ZeroKirbyX]

Originally posted by Osmose
I'd like to note that what you think a theory is and what science thinks a theory is are two different degrees of validity. A theory for us is something that might be proven. For science, that's a hypothesis.

However, it takes a crapload of verifiable proof for something to even qualify as a theory. Science holds itself to super-high expectations, and that evolution has gotten all the way to theory means that for decades scientists have been finding proof of evolution and documenting such proof, while very little has come to life that can disprove the theory. It takes a lot for something to be a theory in the scientific community.

They that I have been learning it for 3 years is that scientific theories (such as evolution) never have PROOF. They gain applicable evidence which supports the theory, but no proof that ever only applies in one way is non-existent, as evidence to a theory can always be used in ways that don't apply to the theory. If that's not the case, I have had consecutively stupid teachers.

[Trevlac]

Quit word-picking, ZeroKirby. We all know Osmose meant "evidence" and not "proof".

[Darrellito]

Originally posted by Blue_Strife
-looks at homophobe bible freaks-

Huh.

And some people wonder why I choose not to follow the 'good book' -_-;;

Please, do not live your life by text. I don't live my life according to the lord of the rings books, and they're about as proven as the bible.

[Blue_Strife]

I never said I live my life by texts. O_o